Neue Google! Wahnsinn!
Seite 117 von 217 Neuester Beitrag: 20.10.09 12:19 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 24.01.06 14:32 | von: Solarparc | Anzahl Beiträge: | 6.411 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 20.10.09 12:19 | von: MobydickDO. | Leser gesamt: | 658.295 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 168 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 115 | 116 | | 118 | 119 | ... 217 > |
Hold on So long(PS-sollte ich Message von Osterwalder bekommen geb ich trotz Feiertag weiter)
Ich weiß nicht, habe ich da etwas verschlafen, oder ist der Teil auf Searchforvideo der irgendwie ein bisschen ein Pornofeeling hatte verschwunden (Gott sei Dank) ist ja für eine seriöse Seite nicht unbedingt zweckdienlich.
einen schönen 1. Mai wünscht
mimba
mimba
...der Erfolg einer Webseite nicht vorwiegend am Bekanntheitsgrad bzw. am Traffic? Hab mal bei alexa geschaut, da ist searchforvideo.com gerade mal auf Platz 6324, was Traffic Rank angeht..
Hat da jemand Infos bezgl. Marketingmaßnahmen?
Gruß,
One
Was die Marketingmaßnahmen anbelangt kann ich dir nur empfehlen den Jahresbericht zu lesen, da wird das vorhaben von Fusa peinlich genau beschrieben.
Hier ein kleiner Auszug
Driving Traffic - Driving traffic of consumers looking for audio/video content to our websites, which will ultimately enable us to sell advertising on all of our websites;
Gathering Data - Developing a valuable library of consumer usage data from our websites that will provides potential commercial licensors of our technology with current, cutting edge information about how their audio and video content is being used by real consumers;
Content Partnerships - Developing relationships and partnerships with a variety of content owners who want their content promoted through the company’s various websites.
Ich kann nicht für andere sprechen, aber ich warte mal auf die Q Zahlen dann sehe ich weiter.
Grüße
mimba
Wie es aussieht, kommt der Kampf um Werbe Ressourcen langsam in die Gänge, was wiederum zur Folge habe könnte, dass auch kleinere Mitstreiter wie Fusa eingesammelt werden müssten.
Also hoffen wir das Beste, den der Kurs ist ja im Moment nicht gerade am Höchststand, sind aber meiner Meinung nach, Handelsübliche Kurschwankungen wo die VK im Überhang sind.
Grüße
mimba
PS: die Q Zahlen müssten ja bald kommen, danach erwarte ich eine Kursumkehr nach oben, sofern diese Zahlen das bringen was ich mir erhoffe.
Fazit:
Fusa hat sich als einer der First-Mover in diesem Segment eine überragende Ausgangsposition verschafft und gehört zu den bekanntesten Anbietern, während die großen Portale und Suchmaschinen diese Entwicklung bisher fast verschlafen haben und diese Lücke nun durch entsprechende Zukäufe decken müssen,
u.a. hat Fusa sich einen dicken Fisch an Land gezogen, daher verstehe ich nicht das der Kurs immer noch so niedrig ist.
Grüße
mimba
MfG
Spitze
**************************************************
Je älter ich werde, desto größer wird die Zahl derer, die mich am Arsch lecken können.
Thank you for your recent inquiry to FUSA Capital Corporation.
Alexa is typically not a 100% reliable gauge of traffic patterns for any Internet property as it represents only a small sample of the Internet population and can easily be manipulated and gamed. Alexa is not something we monitor as a result.
Searchforvideo.com has been adding top tier video content to our site and our user base continues to grow in line with the overall market demand for video search services.
FUSA does continue to innovate and improve our core search engine technology. Any information regarding new products will be announced to the public at the appropriate time.
Sincerely,
Jenifer Osterwalder
ceo
Also Solong Hold on
dieser Wunschtraum wird hier schon seit über einem Jahr geäußert, selbst von den Analysten, aber dennoch wir werden es sehen was Passiert, ich denke Fusa wird mit guten Zahlen aufwarten, besonders da Fusa ja in Jüngster Zeit, sich noch ein dicken Fisch an Land gezogen hat.
PS: 2teSpitze, dein letzter Satz, im Posting Nr. 2911, das muß nu mal nicht wirklich sein, das hier ist ein Forum, wo man sich über Aktien austauscht.
Das hier ist kein Forum, wo man sich mit solchen Kraftwörtern beschäftigt, wenn du das Verlangen hast solche Kraftwörter Schreiben zu müssen,(Tippen) dann tu uns und dir doch bitte den Gefallen, mach dir doch bitte dein eigenes Forum auf, da kannst du gerne, so viele Kraftwörter benutzen wie du magst.
In diesem Sinne, wünsche ich allen hier ein schönes Sonniges Wochenende
MfG
Börsenspinner
Auf diese Information von Mrs. Osterwald warten alle Fusianer, hoffentlich ist es bald so weit, also wir sollten weiter Geduld haben.
Gruß
45ralf
Ich glaube, du spinnst wirklich. Wenn dir was nicht passt, einfach ignorieren.
MfG
Spitze
**************************************************
Je älter ich werde, desto größer wird die Zahl derer, die mich am Arsch lecken können.
Selbst wenn der unwahrscheinliche Fall Eintritt und Fusa nicht übernommen wird, dürften wir uns mittlerweile über dicke Werbeinahmen freuen, was den Kurs ebenfalls einen enormen auftrieb verleihen dürfte.
Grüße
mimba
wir doch mal hoffen mimba bis jetzt wurden, nur Heute, bis dato, über 60.000 Aktien gekauft, um 12:03 wurde 51.000 Aktien gekauft, das Sagt doch schon mal was.
Warten wir mal ab, was sonst noch so Passiert.
schauen wir mal wie es weitergeht.
Möchte mich mal mit einer überaus gewagten Behauptung zurück melden.
Der Kurs heute in USA wird zwischen 0,90 $ und 1 $ schließen. Morgen früh gibt es sie Q-Zahlen, die einiges hoffen lassen werden und in 2 Monaten stehen wir über 2 €. Und spätestens September/Oktober ist FUSA übernommen oder ein offizieller Partner eines Großen.
Wer wettet gegen mich?
Grüße
mimba
Despite speculation that Time Warner may unload AOL or merge it with another Internet firm, some think the best thing for Time Warner to do is hold on to AOL.
By Paul R. La Monica, CNNMoney.com editor at large
April 4 2007: 12:30 PM EDT
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- It is the rumor that just won't die.
After a ballyhooed merger between AOL and Time Warner six years ago that has, to put it kindly, yielded mixed results at best, people on Wall Street love to keep speculating about AOL's future within the Time Warner organization.
Some Wall Street analysts think Time Warner COO Jeff Bewkes, who could succeed CEO Dick Parsons in 2008, is open to the idea of spinning off AOL.
Shares of Time Warner have surged during the past month as analysts have speculated about an AOL spinoff or merger. But other media stocks have rallied too, as has the broader market.
Video§ More video
CNN's Ali Velshi is 'Minding Your Business' on a new rival to YouTube. (March 23)
Play video
In the past few weeks, analysts at both UBS and Bear Stearns have suggested that Time Warner could either spin off a portion of AOL, a similar strategy to what Time Warner (Charts) has done with its cable subsidiary Time Warner Cable (Charts), or merge it with another Internet giant. (Time Warner is also the parent company of CNNMoney.com)
Google (Charts), Yahoo! (Charts), Microsoft's (Charts) MSN or IAC (Charts), the Web conglomerate run by Barry Diller that owns Ask.com, have been mentioned most often as likely candidates in a merger scenario. Google, in fact, bought a 5 percent stake in AOL in late 2005 for $1 billion.
Wall Street ready for a Time Warner shuffle
Shares of Time Warner have increased nearly 6 percent since UBS issued its report on March 16. The stock's rise probably is not due entirely to AOL speculation, however, since other big media stocks such as Walt Disney (Charts), News Corp. and CBS have also rallied, along with the broader market, in recent weeks. The Bear Stearns report came out on March 26.
Executives from Time Warner were not immediately available for comment. But president and COO Jeff Bewkes dismissed talk of an AOL spinoff or sale during a presentation at a Bear Stearns media conference last month.
"We are high on AOL's prospects now," Bewkes said at the conference. "We are optimistic about what they are going to do, which does not lead us to be thinking about taking AOL anywhere."
And some technology and Wall Street analysts also wonder if now is the right time for Time Warner to be considering such a drastic move for AOL.
"The world's biggest media company should have a big presence online and they should have it through a general purpose portal that serves a mass audience. That's the role that a media conglomerate should play," said David Card, a senior analyst with Jupiter Research. "AOL is still a natural for Time Warner. The execution has gone back and forth but they are running it well right now."
To that end, the Internet unit finally seems to be capitalizing on strong online advertising trends and also overhauled its senior management team in the past few months.
Last August, AOL announced that it would no longer charge broadband subscribers fees to have AOL e-mail accounts. The move came as AOL has steadily lost subscribers to both cheaper dial-up services as well as high-speed offerings from phone companies and cable outfits, including Time Warner Cable.
In November, AOL announced that it hired former NBC Universal executive Randy Falco to replace Jonathan Miller as AOL's chairman and CEO.
Time for Time Warner Cable
So far, the changes have led to some encouraging signs for AOL and Time Warner. AOL reported a 49 percent increase in online advertising revenue, as the division has focused more on driving traffic to AOL-owned properties such as the flagship AOL.com, celebrity news site TMZ.com and MapQuest.
"AOL is doing well now in terms of its ad revenue strategy. It made this painful transition from being a largely subscription-supported entity to an ad-supported entity, and there is a lot of momentum," said Greg Sterling, principal with Sterling Market Intelligence, a consulting and research firm focusing on online advertising.
But online advertising is still a small part of AOL's revenue stream. As such, overall sales and adjusted operating income before depreciation and amortization (OIBDA), a key measure of profitability, at AOL slid in the fourth quarter of 2006 due to lower subscriber fees.
Thomas Eagan, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. who follows Time Warner, said that with this in mind, it's too soon to talk about whether or not AOL might be spun out or merged with another Internet or media firm.
Eagan said it makes more sense for Time Warner to see whether or not AOL's new strategy can eventually lead to sustainable gains in profits before deciding to make any major changes regarding AOL's ownership.
"It's premature to spin off AOL, since Time Warner has been indicating that early results from the shift to advertising are positive," Eagan said. "It makes sense for Time Warner to give AOL some time for the new strategy to take hold."
That said, Eagan does not rule out Time Warner doing something with AOL in 2008 or 2009. That's because he expects Bewkes to be calling all the shots by then. Bewkes is widely considered the successor to current Time Warner chairman and CEO Dick Parsons when Parsons' contract with Time Warner expires in 2008.
And Bewkes, despite his support of AOL, did not rule out a possible spinoff down the road. At last month's Bear Stearns conference, he said that if AOL's turnaround continues and the market is willing to pay a higher price for the company, it "could be reasonable to create separate currency" for AOL in order to pursue more acquisitions.
Good times for Time Warner
According to a report by Bear Stearns analyst Spencer Wang, AOL could be worth more than $20 billion, or about a quarter of Time Warner's total market value.
But Greg Gorbatenko, an analyst with Jackson Securities in Chicago, said he did not think that a spinoff of AOL is necessary.
He argues that a separate stock for the cable unit made sense because Time Warner can use that to make major cable acquisitions. By contrast, AOL has made several smaller acquisitions, most notably in the online video market, during the past few years without having an AOL stock to use to finance deals.
"I wouldn't say they need to spin off AOL," Gorbatenko said.
Sterling said that he thought it would not be a good idea for Time Warner to give up any control of AOL now that it finally is benefiting from strong demand for online advertising.
"The promise of the original AOL merger is finally coming clearly into view so the timing of a spinoff or sale doesn't make sense," he said. "Now there is an opportunity for Time Warner to do something interesting with AOL. It's a valuable asset you probably would want to retain."
As for a merger, Sterling said he would not be surprised if Microsoft's MSN or Yahoo! would be interested in AOL since a combination could help boost their efforts to take market share from Google in search.
"Does AOL need to merge with another entity? Microsoft or Yahoo might be hungry for that type of thing," he said.
But Card thinks that a deal with either of those two would make little sense since AOL already has a relationship with, and an investment from, Google. So why abandon a deal with the established industry leader?
"Merging AOL with MSN or Yahoo might be good for jumpstarting their search businesses but it would not do much for AOL," he said.
ifern-ist schließlich unser aller Lady:-))