Trading Bougainville Copper (ADRs) 867948

 

kannst du deine Postings bitte mal genauer erklären. Wenn nicht, dann scher dich davon.  

 

ist mal wieder soweit.....  

 

 

hi

irgendwie finde ichs lustig.

In AU steigt der Kurs wieder um rd 14 %  (auf wieder  64 AUCent)
und in DL setzt der Makler in FRA den Kurs noch tiefer  (bei 0,397 €) fest.

Die 220k bei 0,75 AU$  ... ist das "wieder ne versteckte" Mauer???

  http://cb.iguana2.com/netwealth2/depth/boc    

math. Wunderkind in Deutschland; der Beweis, dass die PISA-Test-Veröffentlichungen ihre Richtigkeit haben.
Mauer: Das werden wir wissen, wenn die Kurse die Mauer erreichen...  

hi Antares,

Tschuldigung,  muß ich das heut morgen vor dem Frühstückskaffee verstehen ???

Nach den Angaben, die ich hier sehe (oder wird mir etwas falsches angezeigt?)
BOC AU Kurs   0,64 AU Cent   und
€   /   AU $       =     1,437
ergibt für mich ein   BOC  Kurs  von  ca     0,445 €    
... oder hat sich mein Taschenrechner jetzt auch verrechnet ???

nen schönen Wochenendgruß
Carlchen
 

Dein Taschenrechner funktioniert perfekt. Nur die Geld-Briefspann spiegelt das nicht 1:1 wieder.

Kommt aber noch....  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z-sdO6pwVHQ

http://www.ourbougainville.org/?page_id=261

In May, 2013 an Ambassador to Bougainville Islands of King David Peii II visited the Conference of the Permanent Forum of Indigenous Issues in New York.


This is the recorded audio-file of the speech:

UN Speech by Bougainville Ambassador, May 2013

kann so eine Rede halten. Ist der König David durch irgend etwas autorisiert? Und heißt das das er alle früheren Verträge nicht achtet? Und was ist mit dem AGB?
Ich fürchte da wird gutes tot geredet.
Wird Zeit das Rio seine Börse öffnet.
Die gegenwärtigen Kurse unseres Nonperformers spiegeln die Lage. Und das kann noch Jahre so weiter gehen, fürchte ich.  

Glaubst du dass diese "Rede" effektiv irgendwo gehalten wurde oder handelt es sich nicht vielmehr um ein "King Pei II" Selbstgespräch? ;-)))

dass uns in zukunft dieser user, der nur hierhin kam, um
unsinn zu posten und provokationen zu leisten, in zukunft
erspart bleibt. scheinbar trieb ihn frust und unzufriedenheit
über sich selbst. das alles kann er nun mit dem kumpel
däumling weiter ausleben... aber nicht im boc-thread.  

OK, hab verstanden. Danke!  

http://ramumine.wordpress.com/

Jubilee Australia: Tell Rio Tinto you are watching

Rio Tinto in Bougainville

   “It is important to understand the significance of holding Rio Tinto responsible for its actions and the actions of the PNG Government. At all times, Rio Tinto, through BCL, controlled the government’s actions on Bougainville.” (Signed Declaration, 2001).

These are not the words of an outsider but of Bougainville’s current President John Momis, speaking of enormous mining conglomerate Rio Tinto’s role in the brutal military attacks against innocent villagers in and around its controversial Panguna mine, from 1989 onwards. He went on to swear in the same signed statement, submitted to US Court proceedings against Rio Tinto in 2001:

   “BCL requested that PNG reopen the mine by whatever means necessary, and later assisted in planning and the imposition of the blockage. I was aware of one meeting where BCL management instructed PNG to “starve the bastards out.” The military actions and the blockage were undertaken for the purpose of reopening the mine so that BCL and PNG could continue to benefit from their commercial enterprise.”

Since 1972 the island of Bougainville, located 500km off the PNG mainland, had played host to the Panguna copper and gold mine – a lucrative operation for Rio Tinto and the PNG state.

Being a large, open-cut mine, surrounding villages suffered from land appropriation, poisoned rivers, village relocation and social disruption, while receiving little over 1% of the earnings.

When negotiations with the company failed and some locals revolted in early 1989, the PNG government staged a military-led counterinsurgency which evidence suggests was funded, facilitated and encouraged by both Bougainville Copper Limited (BCL), a local subsidiary of Australian mining giant Rio Tinto, and the Australian government.

Civilians faced the most brutal campaign of state violence witnessed in the region since the Second World War – including internment camps, the mortaring of children, aerial bombardments, assassinations, rape, and the denial of medicine and humanitarian assistance.

When the war finally ceased in 1998, between 10,000 – 20,000 people had died, some 10% of the island’s population, the majority of deaths being civilians.

Unlike neighbouring East Timor and the Solomon Islands, no truth commission has been held for this war, nor has there been an independent investigation into the systematic violations against the people of Bougainville, reparations for the injuries suffered, or necessary steps taken to prevent a recurrence.

Attempts by victims to obtain justice through PNG’s national court system have been blocked. Citizens of Bougainville filed a landmark class action lawsuit in the US against Rio Tinto in 2001, for environmental damage and war crimes during the civil war. Soon after, evidence was released showing the lengths to which Papua New Guinea was going, with the support of the Australian government, to pressure the US to stop the case. Rio Tinto successfully argued the case should be dismissed on the grounds the claims were not resolvable in a US court. In June this year, after more than a decade, the appeals court finally upheld the dismissal.

The Company is now negotiating to restart the highly controversial mine it was forced to abandon in 1989, wanting to take advantage of skyrocketing copper and gold prices; the Chairman has told media he believes only a minority of Bougainvilleans oppose the mine’s reopening.

The Company has yet to explain how it will remove the huge amount of toxic waste still polluting much of the site. Worse still, communities on Bougainville have yet to be fully briefed on Rio Tinto’s role in defence force operations during the bloody years of 1988-1990.

Until Rio Tinto commits to full disclosure, any attempt to reopen the Bougainville mine will be another exercise of unaccountable corporate abuse against an already deeply scared people.  

Expert: Bougainville referendum must be held between 2015-2020
Quelle: Malum Nalu, 31.8.2013

Constitutional lawyer and Bougainville expert Anthony Regan says no definite date has been set for a referendum on independence for Bougainville. However, a referendum must be held in the 5-year period from 2015-2020 as per the Bougainville Peace Agreement (BPA), he told a Bougainville seminar at the Gateway Hotel on Thursday.

Regan said there seemed to be a “lot of loss of memory” because of the high turnover on politicians and public servants in Papua New Guinea, and to a lesser extent on Bougainville.

“When it comes to things like the referendum, you have people saying the referendum’s going to be held in 2015 or 2016,” he said.
“Sorry, it’s probably not! It’s going to be held whenever Bougainville and the national government agree it’s going to be between 2015 and 2020.

“In addition, we have a lot of people on Bougainville who say the national government can stop the referendum if it’s not satisfied with weapons disposal, good governance.
"Sorry, the national government can’t! What the agreement says is that the period when the referendum must be held, which is 5 years from 2015, the date will be set taking into account weapons disposal and good governance.
“But it can’t go beyond 2020! No matter how bad weapons disposal is, no matter how bad good governance is, it can’t be delayed beyond 2020.”

The 2-day seminar, with theme ‘Sustainability of Bougainville’, is organised by the Port Moresby Bougainville Association and continues today. Generating economic revenue for the future was yesterday’s focus.  

In der Tat, ist es schockierend, dass ein Konzern wie Rio Tinto durch seine Tochter BCL und die Australischen Regierung, soviel Blut an den Händen hat.
Wie immer ziegt sich auch hier der Kapitalismus/Kolonialismus von seiner wiederlichsten Seite.
Jetzt sollte man meinen, das eine Firma wie BCL automatisch von einer Mining Lizens in Bougainville disqualifiziert sein müsste.
Wenn dem aber so wäre, dann sollte es auch Firmen wie DeBeers, Thyssen-Krupp, BASF und Bayer (ehemalig IG Farben) nicht mehr geben, die haben im Verhältnis unendlich mehr Blut an ihren Händen.
Was letztendlich zählt, ist die Bereitschaft, die Fehler der Vergangenheit zu bereinigen, und eine Lösung zu finden, mit der beide Seiten leben können.
ABG hält alle Karten für die eigene Zukunft in der Hand. Es liegt an Ihnen, diese sinnvoll und im besten Sinne für Bougainville auszuspielen.  

http://www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussion/...-bewertung-und-ausblick
 

 

sage ich: "Wenn die Menschen in Bougainville diese Meinung wirklich bei der noch kommenden Abstimmung vertreten, dann sollte BCL seine Lizenzen und Beteiligungen verkaufen - z.B. an China oder Indonesien."

Aber so weit ist es nicht, da nach meinen Infos nur die kleine Gruppe der - außerhalb Bougainvills lebenden - "Grün-Trotzkisten-Faschisten" diese Meinung verbreitet - und das seit vielen Jahren.

Für Bougainville gilt und das wissen die Entscheider vor Ort: Will man Arbeitsplätze, Straßen, Schulen, Kankenhäuser,... - zusammengefaßt Wohlstand - so benötigt man staatlich kontrollierten Bergbau, der sich an die Gesetze hält und auch Steuern zahlt - und nicht den Profit von Wenigen steigernden rücksichtslosen "Kleinabbau" mit Umwelt verschmutzenden Chemikalien.

 

http://www.tradingroom.com.au/apps/qt/...amp;code=BOC&time=latest

Today: 16-Sep-2013

Time(AEST) Price Volume Value

14:59:29 0.6150 286 176
14:46:24 0.6150 279 172
14:39:24 0.6150 267 164
14:25:53 0.6150 225 138
14:13:54 0.6150 228 140
14:00:28 0.6150 230 141
13:48:33 0.6150 203 125
13:34:58 0.6150 206 127
13:23:03 0.6150 216 133
13:22:09 0.6150 366 225
13:09:33 0.6150 257 158
12:57:38 0.6150 271 167
12:44:28 0.6150 318 196
12:32:33 0.6150 271 167
12:19:08 0.6150 297 183
12:07:08 0.6150 389 239
11:53:43 0.6150 371 228
11:41:43 0.6150 379 233
11:28:13 0.6150 362 223
11:16:13 0.6150 390 240
11:02:48 0.6150 408 251
10:50:48 0.6150 403 248
10:37:19 0.6150 492 303
10:25:28 0.6150 653 402
10:00:13 0.6150 438 269  

.........accuses PNG of reneging on referendum funding

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-16/...n-referendum-funding/4959688

Posted 5 hours 12 minutes ago
John Momis Photo: John Momis was sworn in as the President of the Autonomous Bougainville Government in 2010

The President of the Autonomous Bougainville Government, John Momis, says Papua New Guinea has reneged on its commitment to fund a referendum on independence in Bougainville.

The right to the vote was agreed to in the peace agreement struck in 2001, and then written into Papua New Guinea’s constitution.

Mr Momis has told Pacific Beat the Papua New Guinea government has failed to give the ABG its constitutional guaranteed money this year.

"The national government owes us $188 million," Mr Momis said.

"The ABG is not only tasked to deliver services, reconstruct Bougainville, but to develop a new government.

"Our biggest concern is the national government's reneging, the national government's failure, to adhere to the Bougainville peace agreement."

Mr Momis says the Papua New Guinea government promised to release $500 million over the next five years for the restoration development grant, which would go towards the referendum.

“Last year they released it in November.

"It’s very difficult to release funds at the end of the year and expect the administration, which has capacity problems to spend the funds.

"This year the money has not come yet.

Mr Momis believes the Papua New Guinea government has not provided enough help develop Bougainville’s administrative capacity.

"The people of Bougainville deserve to have a real choice, a real choice between two comparably attractive options, namely full autonomy or independence."

Mr Momis says the lack of funding has hampered progress, but Bougainville has come a long way.

"Autonomous government is something new in PNG and in the Pacific, so with very meagre resources and capacity problems I think we've done very well.

"We entered an agreement with the national government when the war ended, and that agreement calls on both governments to have autonomy, weapons disposal, peaceful self-reliance, good governance, democratisation, and these are the objectives of our development strategy."

Auch ich bin investiert und hoffe wie auch Ihr  auf einen Multibagger.
Am Ende regiert das Geld und nicht das Gewissen.
Das mit dem total unschuldsengelhaften BCL/Rio Tinto glaubts Du doch wohl selber nicht.
Was ich mit meinem Beitrag sagen wollte,war das das Argument, das BCL direkt oder indirekt im Bürgekrieg verwickelt war zwar gültig ist, aber andere Beispiele aufzeigen, das es nicht ausreicht, wenn es um genügend Geld geht.