Stans Energy heavy rare earth Prod. 2012

TERBIUM-Actien sind weiterhin der erste Gedanke, wenn es um die Frage geht, was man einem wohlsortierten Silber-Depot "beimischen" sollte:  www.ariva.de/forum/TERBIUM-Actien-386346?page=1#jumppos48

Und davon, dass unsere STANS Energy im Terbium-Rennen die allerbesten Karten hat, bin ich nach wie vor überzeugt!

Deshalb als Fortschreibung des Chart's im Beitrag #801  www.ariva.de/forum/TERBIUM-Vergleich-423152?page=32#jumppos801  vom 25.1.2012 hier jetzt der actualisierte Performance-Vergleich:

Schwere Seltene Erden >>>>>Stans Energy <<<<<<im Trend !!

The Tend is your friend !

Gruß Tr. .-)  

wieviele shorties sich die finger verbrannt haben in den letzten 10-20 Tagen. und auch jene die auf rücksetzer gewartet haben.

da ist wirklich auch der trend dein freund, weil er alle kurzfrist- zocker rausknallt.

jetzt sind wir bei 1,57 . aktuell. aber das beste ist: das ist eigentlich nichts im benchmark und nichts im in situ vergleich und absolut nichts, wenn die anstehenden news auch nur annähernd unsere erwartungen treffen. mach echt freude nach diese firma. endlich... habe schon an mir selbst gezweifelt.....nach dem ganzen letzten jahr. aber inzwischen bin ich doch glatt 15% im plus. nicht zu glauben es waren in der spitze mal 60% minus. 

 

Hallo,

was für News stehen denn an?

Auf die Schnelle habe ich nichts gefunden.

Danke.

 

Also sollte ich jetzt lieber nicht mehr kaufen?! ;)

 

hast du Stans erst heute entdeckt ? Lies dir doch mal das Forum durch, dann kannst du genau sehen, wo das Potential liegt. Ich halte meine Shares bis wir bei 15 USD sind, erst dann kommen Teilverkäufe :-)

LG Schabo04  

bekanntgabe und püntktlich zur konferenz :-)

 

"BK: Stans is at about $1.10, but within a year it could be a $5  stock. In a four-year development program, the upside is probably in the  $20 range. "

TCMR: Wow.

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/12440

 

Schade ^^ er ist von seinem Kursziel von $35 abgewichen.

^^
;)

Ist er nicht mehr überzeugt??

LG

hat deinen beitrag 784 gelesen, sich dann überlegt dass 2000% auch gut sind, und dann einfach von dir abgekupfert. schreib ihm einfach , dass diese kurszielabschreiberei nichts bringt oder er die ne tantieme rüberschieben soll.

 

Korrektur ist denkbar,schaun wir mal. Ist nur meine Meinung.  

Stans E. wie AVL ,TAS .u.a. im   AMEX     gelistet ?  

Robert Mackay
President, CEO and Director
Stans Energy Corp.

Robert Mackay has worked in various facets of the mining industry including diamond drilling, geophysics, hydro metallurgy, mine planning, surveying, grade control, industrial engineering, and open pit & underground production. Robert graduated from the Haileybury School of Mines in 1975 and from the Dakota School of Mines in 1980 with a Mining Engineering Degree. He started in the investment business in 1980 and was Vice President of two national brokerage firms over his successful 20 career. In 2001 he started his own consulting company and worked as a project engineer in Canada, the US, China and Africa, before founding Stans Energy Corp in 2005 and serves as President and CEO today.  

Byron King
Editor, Outstanding Investments and Energy & Scarcity Investor
Agora Financial

A Harvard-trained geologist and former aide to the United States Chief of Naval Operations, Byron King is Agora Financial's resident oil and energy expert and editor. This "old rock hound" uses his expertise and connections in global resource industries to bring the very best opportunities in energy, mining and precious metals. Byron has made frequent appearances in mainstream media such as The Washington Post, MSN Money, Marketwatch.com, Fox Business News, CNBC's Squawk Box, Larry Kudlow, Glenn Beck and PBS Newshour. He also had a feature article written in the Financial Times, and has appeared on both CNN and Marketplace radio broadcasts. Byron has also been quoted in various international publications such as The Guardian and De Volkskrant, and has been a guest on Canada's CBC television broadcast.  

Werden diese beiden Herren für die "Zündung" sorgen?

Auftritt Mackay:
Wednesday, February 1, 2012: 10:20-11:10 am
The 3 C`s of Metallurgy: Chemistry. Chemistry. Chemistry.

Moderator:
Robert Mackay, B.Sc. Mining, President and CEO, Stans Energy Corp.
Panelists:
- Jean-Paul Tognet, Chemist and Nuclear Engineer (Toulouse and Grenoble - France)
- Dr. Valery D. Kosynkin, Sr. REE Metallurgist, Russia’s State Institute of Chemical Technologies (VNIIHT)
- Steve Mackowski, Technical Director, Hastings Rare Metals Ltd.

Auftritt B. King:
Wednesday, February 1, 2012: 4:00-5:00 pm
Inside and Outside China: How will the Rare Earth Market Look in 2012?

Moderator: Clint Cox, Founder, The Anchor House, Inc.
Panelists:
- Byron King, Editor, Outstanding Investments, Energy & Scarcity Investor, Agora Financial
- James Hedrick, Editor, REEHandbook.com & Founder, Hedrick Consultants Inc.
- Luisa Moreno, Senior Mining and Metals Analyst, Jacob Securities Inc.
- Tracy Weslosky, Founding Editor, RareMetalBlog
- Gareth Hatch, Ph.D., Founding Principal, Technology Metals Research, LLC.

Agenda:
http://www.TechnologyMetalsSummit.com/...it-2012-Delegates-Agenda.pdf

Stans ist einer der Hauptsponsoren:
http://www.TechnologyMetalsSummit.com/sponsors.php

The "Who is Who" im REO-Business: http://www.TechnologyMetalsSummit.com/speakers.php  

Noch ein gutes Stündchen zur Konferenz.

Hat jemand zufällig einen Live Stream dazu gefunden?

LG
Bio

World trade organization geht gegen Chinas Exportbeschränkungen vor.
Dies wird aber nur kleine Teile , der Beschränkungen treffen.

A World Trade Organisation ruling against China’s restrictions on raw material exports could force changes to some of its rare earth policies but is unlikely to yield the boost in exports of the metals that consumers want to see.

A WTO panel on Monday said China violated global trading rules by restricting exports of raw materials like bauxite, coke, magnesium, manganese and zinc, which inflated prices and gave domestic Chinese firms an unfair competitive advantage.

Rare earth metals were not part of Monday’s ruling, but users of the crucial group of 17 elements used in the renewables and high-tech sectors hope that China will also scrap export limits on these commodities, leading to higher volume and lower prices. They are likely to be disappointed.

“It is still too early to say what the impact will be but I can’t see it having a big impact on prices — the main issue will still be supply and demand,” said Vivian Pang, an analyst with the Asian Metal consultancy in Beijing.

The reason, say analysts, is that even if China removes export quotas, it is unlikely to lift its production limits, which are meant to limit environmental damage from rare earths mining and keep prices — and profits — high.

China, which produces about 95 percent of global rare earth supplies, capped production at 93,800 tonnes in 2011, up only 5 percent compared with the year before despite soaring demand. It began a nationwide inspection at the end of August to stop rare earth miners from breaking the cap.

While the ruling could be a setback for China in its efforts to clean up and cash in on its rare earth reserves, its overall strategy need not change, said Tu Xinquan, associate director of the China Institute of WTO Studies.

“There are other ways it can meet its objectives,” he said, referring to the output limits.

A number of U.S. lawmakers urged the United States to use the WTO decision to launch a new case to force China to lift its rare earth export restrictions. Some producers said they were optimistic the action would change Chinese policy.

“The decision of the appellate body is a huge victory for the United States,” said Michael Silver, chief executive of American Elements, a U.S.-based rare earth processor. “It confirms the existence of the two-tiered price structure that has caused so much concern.”

EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht said the decision would force China to drop export restrictions for the materials mentioned in the case and for rare earths.

The United States, European Union and Mexico had all launched WTO legal cases in 2009, challenging China’s right to restrict raw material exports and force prices to rise.
Advertisement

China’s control over supplies means that it is in a strong position to disregard WTO rulings, but industry figures say it is unlikely to do so.

“The question is whether China will actually stop or at least reduce export taxes,” said Silver. “I expect they will, so they remain WTO members in good standing.”

China’s Ministry of Commerce said on Monday it “deeply regrets” the ruling but would comply.

WTO provisions allow a country to limit trade on health and environmental grounds, but it said on Monday that China had been “unable to demonstrate” that its restrictions helped conserve resources, cut pollution or improve public health.

Beijing has said that unregulated rare earth exploitation had caused untold damage in big producing regions like Inner Mongolia. It has also said it should not have to bear so much of the global output burden, especially as domestic demand grows.

China is likely to continue to play up the environmental impact of extracting rare earths, but the issue is whether it can convince the WTO that its policies are applied equally to foreign and domestic firms. That helps explain China’s attention to the domestic output cap, which is not subject to global trade rules.

China successfully used a similar strategy in 2004 when imposing quotas on coking coal exports. Despite the threat of WTO action, exports have dwindled from 10 million tonnes a decade ago to 3.6 million tonnes last year, and it is now a huge net importer.

In the last few years, China has banned dozens of unlicensed rare earth miners and raised entry thresholds. It has also imposed strict export limits and cracked down on smuggling.

It issued export quotas amounting to 30,184 tonnes in 2011, and said the figure for 2012 would remain unchanged in order to “guarantee international demand.” Exporters used just 56 percent of their allocations last year.

China has rejected claims that domestic firms have gained an unfair advantage, saying nationwide output caps — which are compliant with WTO rules — have also raised domestic prices and forced local users to scale back operations.

The question for the WTO is whether or not Chinese firms gain an unfair advantage from their government’s policies, but even if China is forced to make changes, there is nothing foreign buyers can do to stop Chinese producers from selling to domestic consumers at a cheaper price, said Tu.

“I don’t know if domestic firms get cheaper supplies but if it is just enterprises setting prices, rather than the government, there is nothing anyone can say about it.”

© Thomson Reuters

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/01/31/...ling-on-export-curbs/

 

sollte zu Mindoro ...

Entschuldigung !

jetzt gehts aber runter....ohne news....verstehe wer will....klar Gewinnmitnahmen aber sowas...mal sehenob wir uns noch fangen?!

Gab es bei der PK irgend welche Neuigkeiten?

 

Manche glauben wohl fälschlich, dass Lynas nun vor Stans den großen Markt hat. Lynas hat heute für Malaysia die Erlaubnis bekommen. Der Kurs steigt enorm.

Ersten denke ich, dass Stans eher dran ist,

zweitens, dass beide einen sehr guten Markt haben werden.

 

 

Ist aber nichts, was uns STANS-Freunde aufregen sollte,
denn LYNAS hatte ja etwas Nachhol-Bedarf:

lg

Lasst euch nicht rausdrängen, das gleiche Spiel hatten wir schon einmal vor einem Jahr.
Damals bin ich Teilausgestiegen und musste zwei Tage später drauf zahlen, da ich dann zu wesentlich höheren Kursen wieder eingestiegen bin. Also geduldig sein, unsere Zeit kommt jetzt, bin mir sicher.

LG Marcel