Gazprom 903276


Seite 46 von 3971
Neuester Beitrag: 30.08.24 18:04
Eröffnet am:09.12.07 12:08von: a.z.Anzahl Beiträge:100.26
Neuester Beitrag:30.08.24 18:04von: SilberrueckenLeser gesamt:32.731.375
Forum:Börse Leser heute:841
Bewertet mit:
134


 
Seite: < 1 | ... | 43 | 44 | 45 |
| 47 | 48 | 49 | ... 3971  >  

3 Postings, 5455 Tage bin_Anfängerhier gibt es was in russisch:

 
  
    #1126
16.03.13 18:15
http://quote.rbc.ru/topnews/2013/03/13/33903424.html
(es geht um Gespräche mit China über neue Lieferverträge)  

3 Postings, 5455 Tage bin_AnfängerDoku über Schiefergas

 
  
    #1127
16.03.13 19:30
sehr interessant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi0u9it6GEY
Wenn es so ist, wird es hoffentlich in Europa nie zugelassen  

9 Postings, 4289 Tage Semmiegazprom

 
  
    #1128
1
17.03.13 11:05

1. roadshow for bond placement

2. china visit

3. this:

 

 

Prosperity Adds More Gazprom as Putin Pushes Improvement
By Halia Pavliva & Vladimir Kuznetsov -                  Mar 7, 2013 6:01 PM GMT+0100

Prosperity Capital Management Ltd., whose Russia fund beat 97 percent of peers in the past year, bought more shares of OAO Gazprom (OGZPY) on prospects Russia will push its gas export monopoly to be more efficient.

“The government is putting a lot of pressure on Gazprom to operate in a more transparent and efficient way and the company is turning around,” Mattias Westman, who helps oversee about $4 billion in Russian assets as chief executive officer of Prosperity in London, said by phone yesterday. “It’s a good investment longer term, especially as valuations are very low and attractive.”

Gazprom, the world’s biggest natural gas producer, has slumped 37 percent over the past two years to trade at 2.7 times earnings, the cheapest stock on Russia’s Micex (INDEXCF) Index, as the euro-zone recession cut demand from its top customer. PresidentVladimir Putin urged the company, Russia’s largest, to improve its performance and boost corporate governance in a Feb. 21speech at Gazprom’s 20th anniversary gala.

American depositary receipts of Gazprom fell 0.3 percent to $8.69 by 11:56 a.m. in New York, as theBloomberg Russia-US Equity Index (RUS14BN) of the most-traded Russian companies in the U.S. traded little changed at 101.89. Gazprom dropped 1.1 percent on the 50-stock Micex, to 133.65 rubles, or $4.35. One depositary receipt equals two shares.

Prosperity, based in London, didn’t hold Gazprom stock for“about 10 years and added it to the portfolio relatively recently, investing mostly in the Moscow-listed stock,” said Westman, a founding partner. The firm bought shares of Gazprom in 2010 for the first time in 13 years, Westman said in November of that year. They bought more stock toward the end of 2012 and this year, he said today.

Government Control

The Prosperity Russia Domestic Fund (PRUSSDA) returned 8.7 percent in the past year and 7.5 percent in 2013, beating 91 percent of its peers in that period, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Russia’s government owns just more than 50 percent of Gazprom, data compiled by Bloomberg show, and gets about 50 percent of budget revenue from oil and gas.

Gazprom probably overshot its plan for capital spending by $4 billion in 2012 after a “very intensive” fourth quarter pushed annual expenditure by as much as $44 billion, Chief Financial Officer Andrey Kruglov said in a Jan. 17 earnings conference call.

To maintain its dominance over natural gas exports, Gazprom needs to react quickly to changes on global markets and be able to negotiate effectively with its partners, Putin said in last month’s address. “It is imperative to consistently eliminate anything that is dragging the company down,” he said.

Top Pick

Shares of Gazprom may surge 30 percent if the government decides to split the company into production and transport units or revamp its management, according to Elena Loven, who helps manage more than 1 billion euros ($1.3 billion) in Russian stocks at Swedbank Robur, Sweden’s second-largest lender.

The stock is one of Loven’s top picks over the next 10 years, though Swedbank Robur has recently been underweight Gazprom, she said in a March 5 interview in Moscow. The Swedbank Robur Rysslandsfond (SWRRYSS), which invests in Russian equities, has lost 12 percent over the past year and 0.3 percent in 2013, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Gazprom plans to sell bonds in euros for the first time since July, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified as the details aren’t public.

 

 

 

 

9 Postings, 4289 Tage Semmiegazprom

 
  
    #1129
2
17.03.13 11:53

 4.

 

 

Market Watchers Contemplate a Gazprom Reshuffle

A new executive at the head of Gazprom could give  a mighty boost to the stock price of the world's biggest gas  producer, especially if the replacement came with a policy change,  according to managers that run funds with Russian assets.

The belief comes even as there is understanding that  the state-controlled giant makes its key moves at the government's  bidding, and Gazprom's veteran chief, Alexei  Miller, has a contract to lead the company until June  2016.

Gazprom, where Miller has been at the helm since 2001, is now facing  a strong challenge to its lead in the Russian gas universe  from the country's oil champion Rosneft  and private gas producer Novatek.

"A company like Gazprom, where management has been incumbent  for a long time, could probably benefit from a shake-up," said Mattias  Westman, founding partner at Prosperity Capital Management. "There are  other Russian state-controlled companies that are better run than Gazprom."

Westman said he referred to Rosneft, led by former Kremlin  and Cabinet heavyweight Igor  Sechin; and Russia's biggest lender, Sberbank,  managed by former Economic Development Minister German Gref.

Gazprom has in the past few years come under a barrage  of criticism for its multibillion projects to build new pipelines  to Europe — Nord Stream and South Stream — at a time  when its exports to the continent have dwindled. Another perceived misstep,  which led to the decline in European sales, was the company's  refusal until last year to make price concessions, regardless of the  glut on the market.

A reshuffle at the top of the company could send  an encouraging message to the investment community, said Gennady  Sukhanov, who helps manage the Russian oil fund at TKB BNP Paribas  Investment Partners.

"A change of the chief executive could signal a different policy,"  he said. "If the new person had good reputation, it would be taken well  by the market."

Gazprom's stock could then as much as double in value, he said.

"If I see that Gazprom is about to change its policy, I will mortgage my  apartment and buy Gazprom shares," Sukhanov said.

Yelena Loven, who is part of the team that manages Russian stocks  at Swedbank Robur, said Gazprom could gain 30 percent if  the government decided to revamp its management, Bloomberg reported  last week. Loven was on vacation and unavailable to comment  for this story.

Westman said more efficient management could boost the share price, but  he didn't indicate how much.

News media have occasionally reported rumors in the past few years that  Miller was on his way out. Most recently, Financial Times blogger Nick  Butler said Monday that these rumblings "continue to swirl around  the markets across Europe."

Westman and Sukhanov said they were unaware of any changes  in the near future.

There have not been any reports about who might succeed Miller.

Gazprom could benefit from a top executive that has a record  of successfully running another traded company, Sukhanov said. As one  possible replacement, he named Alexander Dyukov, chief of Gazprom's oil  arm, Gazprom Neft.

Westman said only that he would like to see "someone from the  outside coming in."

Another view held by investors is that the name of Gazprom's  top executive does not matter, but the government's willingness  to plot another course for the company would be important.

A reshuffle would appeal to investors only if it comes with  a plan for Gazprom to spin off several companies, making it  easier for investors to understand the business, said Pascal  Menges, energy fund manager at Swiss investment firm Lombard Odier.  The fund has a small exposure to Russian assets.

In addition to having an oil arm, Gazprom is big in power  generation and runs the country's vast network of gas  pipelines.

According to Westman, the government could turn Gazprom into a  more valuable asset by changing the rules of the game, even if it  continues to rely on the current executive team. For instance,  a Gazprom that had to allow greater access of other gas producers  to its sprawling pipelines would exercise more spending prudence as  a result of more competition, he said.

Investment bank Renaissance  Capital said Thursday that it expected the domestic gas sector  to undergo an overhaul over the next few years because Gazprom  needs to respond to pressure from domestic and global  competition.

"We think the Russian government will finally decide to move toward  an open-market model for the gas industry, ushering in an  independently run transportation system, general parity between domestic  and export prices, and ultimately liberalized exports of gas,"  the bank's analysts said in a research note.

Recent Gazprom performance has been a mixed bag. Its European exports  sank 7 percent to 139 billion cubic meters last year, the company said  last month.

And the reason for the lower sales, industry analysts said, was  largely the company's refusal until last year to tweak prices  regardless of the glut on the market.

Likewise, private gas producers have chipped away at Gazprom's domestic  market share.

On the bright side, Gazprom paid record dividends for 2011.  The payout, however, will likely be smaller for last year because  of the decline in sales.



Read more: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/...6926.html#ixzz2NnEtTs7w
The Moscow Times 

 

 

429 Postings, 8614 Tage Samba4Auch wenn die meisten über diesen kalten und

 
  
    #1130
20.03.13 11:37
düsteren Winter klagen, erhoffe ich mir, dass zumindest Gazprom davon profitieren konnte. Wir haben den kältesten Winter seit Jahren. Und das nicht nur in Deutschland. Daher hoffe ich, dass Gazprom seine Liefermengen in den letzten 2 Quartalen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr steigern konnte und somit das Minus bei derlIfermenge für das gesamte Geschäftsjahr geringer ist als es die Prognosen der Analysten sind.  

488 Postings, 5498 Tage Wodan23und ich hoffe, dass

 
  
    #1131
20.03.13 12:24
Gazprom nicht die zyprische Zeche zahlen muss. Die haben ja jetzt den Zypern Milliarden für ein Gasfeld in Aussicht gestellt obwohl die geopolitische Lage, z.B. mit der Türkei nicht geklärt ist. Desweiteren habe ich gelesen das das Gas technisch schwer zu holen ist.
Man kann gespannt sein wie Putin entscheidet.  

1654 Postings, 4418 Tage Mexico ManSo,

 
  
    #1132
20.03.13 14:46

bin jetzt hier auch mal mit an Bord. Bin mal gespannt wo die Reise hinführt. Sehe Gazprom sehr langfristig.

 

277 Postings, 5372 Tage Karlie10@Wodan & Mexico

 
  
    #1133
20.03.13 15:09
Ist der Rebound gelungen? Wie hoch wird sie steigen?  

488 Postings, 5498 Tage Wodan23@karlie

 
  
    #1134
21.03.13 12:58
keine Ahnung ...  

488 Postings, 5498 Tage Wodan23man könnte

 
  
    #1135
21.03.13 13:05
einen Zuschlag für das zyprische Gas an Gazprom natürlich auch als wirtschaftlichen Superhammer sehen. Angeblcih liegt dort vor der Küsten Gas im Wert von 600 Milliarden Dollar. Aber die Infrastrukturkosten wären acuh enorm.... Nichts ist umsonst.
Schaun ma mal...

91 Postings, 4244 Tage KapitaliGazprom

 
  
    #1136
21.03.13 14:18

Die Amerikaner bohren ja schon dort aber die Russen haben für diese Art von Tiefenbohrungen das bessere kow how. Aber ob mit oder ohne Zypern sehe ich Gazprom langfristig positiv und als gutes und solides Invest (meine Meinung).

 

91 Postings, 4244 Tage KapitaliGazprom / Zypern

 
  
    #1137
23.03.13 12:55

Wir haben den Rücksetzer doch wohl nicht, weil Gazprom jetzt allein auf die zypriotischen Gasfelder verzichtet?

Gas haben die Russen selber mehr als genug. Die Investitionskosten für eine alleinige Erschließung und Nutzung wären um ein vielfaches höher gewesen, als das was jetzt passiert. Gazprom wollte etwas vom Kuchen abhaben, was sie je jetzt wohl auch bekommen, da sie bei den Verhandlungen mit am Tisch sitzen. Aber sie wollten nicht den ganzen Kuchen alleine bezahlen. Das hat sich der Kremel vorher sicher 3x durchgerechnet. Deshalb sehe ich die Entwicklung jetzt hier eher als positiv für Gazprom.

 

 

11 Postings, 5388 Tage pension-stadtmauerSUPER

 
  
    #1138
24.03.13 17:13
Супер Сделка с Китаем, что г-н Путин! Что касается г-на Эттингера?  

488 Postings, 5498 Tage Wodan23Am Wochenende

 
  
    #1139
1
25.03.13 12:15
haben die Chinesen einen Megadeal mit RUssland bzw. Gazprom ausgehandelt.
Es geht um Lieferverträge ab 38, erhöhbar bis 60 Milliarden Kubikmeter im Jahr (Beginn 2018). Eine Pipeline soll gebaut werden. Somit macht sich Gazprom noch unabhängiger von Europa. Und was passiert hier, wo die Zukunft gehandelt wird? Wo wir einen der strengsten Winter sein langem haben?
+ 1 % ý 12.08 Uhr. Welche News sollen noch kommen? Ich hatte gedacht, das der Kurs nach diesen News ziemlich anziehen wird. Naja ich schau nochmal um 16.00 Uhr rein, wenn die Amis aufgestanden sind.
Woran liegts? Werden in Zypern gerade Gazprommilliarden verbrannt?Ich weiss es nicht.

19 Postings, 4263 Tage Europumpe8Kursverlauf

 
  
    #1140
27.03.13 18:23

Die Kurse der US-Erdöl-und Erdgasfirmen kennen nur eine Richtung -  nach oben!

Gazprom kann noch so viel Umsatz machen, der Kurs kommt einfach nicht in die

Gänge. Schwer zu verstehen !

 

 

3726 Postings, 8230 Tage diplom-oekonom@Euro

 
  
    #1141
28.03.13 07:54
Welche Firmen sind denn das ?

Ich kenne Consol, Sandridge, Excelon - da geht nichts nach oben.
Ganz zu schweigen von ENI, Total, Repsol, Petrobras.  

1086 Postings, 4425 Tage Timo1990/

 
  
    #1142
28.03.13 11:17

"Welche Firmen sind denn das ?

Ich kenne Consol, Sandridge, Excelon - da geht nichts nach oben.
Ganz zu schweigen von ENI, Total, Repsol, Petrobras.  "

eni, total, repsol, petrobas sind auch keine us firmen, und die meinte er ja. die großen dort gehen langfristig nach oben, also so falsch ist das nicht. conoco, exxon, chevron.
 

 

1086 Postings, 4425 Tage Timo1990shareholder value

 
  
    #1143
28.03.13 11:22

und der unterschied besteht in der eignerstruktur. diese konzerne investieren, um damit zukünftigen ertrag für die anteilseigner zu generieren. gazprom investiert um politische ziele zu verfolgen und arbeitsplätze zu schaffen, die investitionen sind zu großen teilen betriebswirtschaftlich nicht sinnvoll, aber sie zählen bilanziell nicht als verlust, schließlich handelt es sich um mittelverwendung. darum ist das kgv niedrig, aber bei den aktionären kommt wenig an.

 

9 Postings, 4289 Tage Semmiemorganstanly-russia-buy

 
  
    #1144
28.03.13 15:52

 

Buy Russia now- 7 reasons why valuation discount will narrow
Morgan Stanley

March 27, 2013

We are turning positive on Russian equities. Valuation is too cheap relative to EM and seven reasons suggest that either the valuation discount is excessive or potential catalysts could cause it to come down in the medium term.Russian equities are very cheap, in our view. Russian equities have only been cheaper (relative to EM) in late 2008. The valuation discount belies a relatively high ROE and is evident across sectors (not just in Energy), in our view.

Seven reasons for the discount to come down


1. Better macro fundamentals and resilience to shocks. 

2. Governance and political risk are more than fairly discounted and may be improving at the margin. 

3. Structural reforms - glass half full. We see modest progress, with the potential for more.

4. The energy sector's deep discount fully reflects the challenges. Russia has de-rated 27% versus crude oil and we see some potentially positive catalysts.

5. Russia is an attractive dividend yield play with a trailing 3.7% DY and a very low payout ratio (19%).

6. Global growth uplift in 2H13 is a boon to Russia and lead indicators suggest EPS growth has bottomed.

7. Domestic growth, inflation and rates are turning more supportive.

Why now? Global growth momentum is picking up, with an acceleration to above trend in 2H13 for the first time in two years. We are close to the turning points in domestic inflation and GDP growth. For much of last year earnings forecasts were declining, but revisions have rebounded strongly. Technicals so far have been unhelpful, but sentiment is now very downbeat.Risks include volatility given stretched investor sentiment metrics; a relapse/stagnation on the policy front in Russia; and premature tightening in China/US or other forces de-railing the global recovery we assume.

 

91 Postings, 4244 Tage KapitaliGazprom

 
  
    #1145
28.03.13 19:08

Cool down - wir sprechen hier ja nicht von einer Klitsche, sonder von Gazprom. Also alle mal locker bleiben. KBV 0,4! Das wir schon. Geduld haben!!!

 

3676 Postings, 5647 Tage karassDividende

 
  
    #1146
29.03.13 14:15
muss die Steuer in RUS und D bezahlt werden bzw. was bleibt am Ende noch übrig?  

1086 Postings, 4425 Tage Timo1990div

 
  
    #1147
2
29.03.13 16:57

Mit Freibetrag: 15% Quellensteuer + ca. 3,6% Spesen -> 18,6% Abzug -> 81,4% bleiben übrig (sicher)

Ohne Freibetrag: 15% Quellensteuer+ca. 3,6% Spesenkosten + 10,55% deutsche abgeltungssteuer mit soli. also bleiben 70,85% der dividende bei dir. (so müsste es sein)

 

91 Postings, 4244 Tage Kapitali#1152

 
  
    #1148
29.03.13 17:27

Top analysiert Timo. Rechne ich auch so.

 

153 Postings, 6303 Tage neo_1976Dividende

 
  
    #1149
1
02.04.13 09:02
Wie hoch ist die Dividende denn? Kann nichts finden?!?! Danke  

105 Postings, 4232 Tage Paul DriesGuckst Du hier

 
  
    #1150
02.04.13 09:06

Seite: < 1 | ... | 43 | 44 | 45 |
| 47 | 48 | 49 | ... 3971  >  
   Antwort einfügen - nach oben