Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)
Seite 467 von 568 Neuester Beitrag: 26.09.24 05:48 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 10.09.08 00:24 | von: Abenteurer | Anzahl Beiträge: | 15.197 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 26.09.24 05:48 | von: Teras | Leser gesamt: | 2.137.216 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 445 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 465 | 466 | | 468 | 469 | ... 568 > |
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2296607
$ 38,756,999.00 withdrawn:
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2296606
$ 38,756,999.00 withdrawn:
Der Info-Schnipsel zum Docket #36549 http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2296607 greift vermittels der GetDocument-ID 2296607 das zugehörige Document aus der DatenBank ab, vermittels dessen die Forderung #27349 (aus LBHI 08-13555) http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/597943 in Höhe von 38,756,999.00 U$-Dollares zurückzogen wird.
Doch obwohl der Info-Schnipsel zum Docket #36550 http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2296606 der Zählung nach HÖHER liegt (als der Info-Schnipsel zum Docket #36549), greift er das zugehörige Document, vermittels dessen die Forderung #27350 (aus LBSF 08-13888) http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/530449 in Höhe von 38,756,999.00 U$-Dollares zurückzogen wird, dennoch vermittels der NIEDRIGER liegenden GetDocument-ID 2296606 aus der DatenBank ab...
Ob diese Nexo-cruciform paradoxe über-Kreuz-Lage an der zeitweisen Nicht-Zugreifbarkeit derer beiden Dockets mitgewirkt hat, ist schwer zu sagen. --- Jeden Falles sind ZWEI Forderungen in Höhe von JEWEILS 38,756,999.00 U$-Dollares zurückzogen worden.
Our next "Withdrawal of Claim(s)" Docket will be the Docket numbered 36572...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297242
$ 4,122.00 withdrawn.
John E. Jureller Jr. on behalf of Pinnacle Trustees Ltd,
Trustees of the Vida Amini Trust. (Jureller, John).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297245
$ 43,150.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297246
$ 7.00 withdrawn. 7 (SEVEN!) U$ Dollars withdrawn; maybee they withdraw another 3...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297247
$ 632.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297249
$ 2,163,021.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297405
$ 574,398.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297408
$ 27,806.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297409
$ 2,103.00 withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 35787.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297507
$ 22,620,000.00 [id est: Proof of Claim Number 22202] shall be deemed
withdrawn with Prejudice subject to this Stipulation and [proposed] Order...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297746
$ 2,972,211.00 withdrawn.
to Issue Subpoenas for the Production of Documents and Authorizing the
Examination of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf
of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: "none"...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297758
$ 9,070,643.oo withdrawn after Subpoena:
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 35546, 35625.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2297759
2 Times $ 909.oo withdrawn after 2 Subpoenas.
(Claim No. 17322) filed by Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC
(Claims and Noticing Agent). (Baer, Herbert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2298072
$ 140,652.oo withdrawn.
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2298549
This ==> http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/711040
"contingent" Claim numbered 30117 of Bank of America, N.A. withdrawn:
(Claim of... [2 private Persons]) filed by John E. Jureller Jr.
on behalf of... [a private Person]. (Jureller, John).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2298605
$ 291,872.oo withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2298606
$ 1,092,894.oo withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2298939
$ 22,701,179.72 are reduced to $ 213,534.85 by this PARTIAL Withdrawal:
Derartige Claim(s)-Reductions sind natürlich ein Grund dafür,
dass in diesem Chapter-11-Verfahren weiterhin Phantasie ist.
LG: Teras.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document : http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2299028
$ 387,097.oo withdrawn.
The arguments in federal appeals court in New York renewed a murky, years-old court battle with huge implications for the brokerage's creditors, including Lehman affiliates and hedge funds.
"It was made very clear" in the asset purchase agreement "what was going to Barclays and what was staying behind," said the brokerage's lawyer, William Maguire. "The deal didn't exclude just some cash, it excluded all cash."
The dispute has its roots in the hectic sale of the brokerage's assets to Barclays in the days following the $639 billion bankruptcy of parent company Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc in September of 2008.
The brokerage contends the $250 million deal did not include the brokerage's cash assets. But Barclays says otherwise, relying on a so-called clarification letter signed after the deal was approved.
The disputed assets include margin to support exchange-traded derivatives, which could top $5 billion. They also include roughly $2 billion in so-called "clearance box" assets, which facilitate the clearance of securities trading. And they include $769 million promised to Barclays if Lehman's customers were paid in full.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James Peck approved the deal in 2008. Days later, the sides signed a "clarification" letter on the cash assets.
In 2011, Peck ruled that the clearance box assets should go to Barclays and the margin assets should stay with the brokerage. Then in June 2012, Judge Katherine Forrest in federal court in New York partially reversed Peck's ruling, assigning both the margin and the clearance assets to Barclays.
The focus of Wednesday's arguments was on the margin assets, over which the sides presented drastically diverging narratives.
Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/05/29/...ls-panel/#ixzz2Ul0iHqWr