Politik um Gazprom
aber bezüglich isis hab ich ein ganz ganz schlechtes gefühl bezüglich der türkei. das könnte das land zereissen, schliesslich ist es ein offenes geheimnis, das die türken lange der heimliche sponsor waren - und die sind in der nato. toll!
ohne russland geht da nichts.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "lifeguard" |
Wertpapier: Gazprom ADR |
Optionen
| Boardmail an "lifeguard" |
Wertpapier: Gazprom ADR |
Jetzt wo alles so wie so schrottreif ist, könnten wir zwei Fliegen auf ein Mal erschlagen.
Wir könnten den Müll entsorgen und gleichzeitig neben allen anderen Kriegstreibern eine gute Figur machen.
http://www.n-tv.de/politik/...lgarien-gestrandet-article13659346.html
Russia was quick to condemn the airstrikes. The Washington Post noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin — the patron saint of territorial integrity — decried the airstrikes as a violation of Syria's sovereignty.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/...is-al-qaeda-assad-113157006.html#APZDzUD
Auszug: "...Die Annexion der Halbinsel Krim durch Russland werde sein Land nie akzeptieren..."
Kommentar: Ist das Pfeifen im Walde? oder weiß er mehr - z.B. bzgl. der möglichen Unterstützung der USA für die umfassende WiederBewaffnung? Wenn das so wäre, erklärten sich auch die polnischen Waffen an die Ukraine und zahreiche andere Vorgänge.
Rückblick auf das USA-Vietnam Debakel und eine Erklärung, warum die USA lieber auf Stellvertreter setzt - und auf Fernwaffen:
"...War, we are told by a wise elder, is the “pursuit of policy by other means.”..."
https://medium.com/the-bridge/...witz-turned-on-his-head-f69275579cf1
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/23/opinion/...ime-president/index.html
Dolgow kritisierte den Verlauf der Ermittlungen zu dem tödlichen Brand im Gewerkschaftshaus in Odessa. „All diese Verbrechen wurden von radikalen Kräften verübt, die im politischen Leben der Ukraine immer noch etwas zu sagen haben“, so Dolgow. Russland überwache die Vorgänge in der Ukraine. Der Kampf gegen Straflosigkeit sei einer der wichtigsten Bestandteile zur langfristigen Regelung und Stabilisierung der Lage in der Ukraine, so Dolgow.
Das russische Außenministerium wirft dem Westen Doppelstandards vor. „Der Westen fordert zwar immer die Bekämpfung der Straflosigkeit und wendet sich an Strukturen wie den Internationalen Strafgerichtshof, doch jetzt scheut sich der Westen“, so
http://de.ria.ru/zeitungen/20140925/269636468.html
statt die EU, NATO und USA nach Waffen anzubetteln, sollen sie besser um die Milliarden für ihre Schulden betteln.
Ein strenger Winter wird so einiges regeln.
Kommentar: Frei übersetzt: Enteignung von ausländischem Vermögen.
Nur, dass der Staat die Salamitaktik anwendet.
Er zieht die ehrlichen Bürger der Reihe nach aus und wenn sie ins Heim kommen müssen die Kinder zahlen und das Elternhaus verkaufen usw. .
Am besten du bist kriminell in Deutschland, irgendwann wird solchen in Berlin auch noch ein Denkmal gebaut.
Gruß
am besten erst nächste woche wieder reinschauen.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "lifeguard" |
Wertpapier: Gazprom ADR |
Zu beobachten ist deshalb einerseits das Wahlergebnis - auch ob es korrekt oder manipuliert wird - und wichtiger noch: die Reaktion der Duma darauf.
Persönlich kalkuliere ich ein, daß Lettland allerdings im Verlauf des USA-Rußland Konflikts sowieso zur rußischen Förderation wechselt, denn - unter Berücksichtigung ALLER sich IM LAND aufhaltenden Bürger stellen die mit rußischen Wurzeln inzwischen die Mehrheit.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "lifeguard" |
Wertpapier: Gazprom ADR |
July 14
Analysis
By Peter Zeihan
The Chinese are invading Russia — not with tanks, but with suitcases.
Alexander Shaikin, in charge of controlling the Russian-Chinese border, said on June 29 that 1.5 million people from China have illegally entered the Russian Far East over the past 18 months.
Reported by The Moscow Times, Shaikin’s claim is likely exaggerated, but increased Chinese migration is marking a return of Chinese influence to these territories. And any territorial dispute could disrupt relations between Asia’s largest continental powers.
It’s impossible to know the exact level of Chinese migration into the Russian Far East; Russia has not run a census in over a decade. But by all indications, a significant river of people is surging across the border.
The Moscow Carnegie Center, the only organization to launch an independent study, claimed that there were about 250,000 Chinese in Russia in 1997. The Interior Ministry has claimed that there are 2 million. Other estimates place the Chinese population at 5 million.
Regardless, the Federal Migration Service fears a flood. The service has repeatedly warned that the Chinese could become the dominant ethnic group in the Russian Far East in 20 to 30 years. Such an occurrence would require an annual influx of about 250,000 to 300,000 Chinese, less than one-third the rate that Shaikin currently claims.
China Looks the Other Way
There are reasons to believe that the flow will hit these levels, with at least tacit help from Beijing. The Russian Far East is becoming China’s safety valve, much like Mexico lets off population pressures with migration into the United States. China has more than 1.2 billion people — more than eight times Russia’s population. Only 7.4 million Russians populate the entire Russian Far East, versus more than 70 million in northeast China. The Russian Far East is comparatively empty, with only 1.3 people per kilometer. China’s Manchurian population has increased 13 percent in a little more than a decade.
Any kind of Chinese expansion into the region will eventually bring about a question: What is Beijing’s claim there? Most of the border region — an area roughly the size of Iran — used to be Chinese. Russia took the territory in 1858 and 1860 with the Treaties of Aigun and Peking, respectively. Of all of the unequal treaties forced upon the Qing dynasty by outside powers in the 19th century, these are the only two China has not managed to overcome. China and Russia signed a border agreement in 1999, but the Beijing government has never formally accepted the Aigun and Peking treaties.
Valuable Ports and Resources
The Russian Far East also holds resources that are valuable to an ever-growing China. The region is rich in natural resources such as oil, gas and timber. It is easier to send these goods to Asia instead of shipping them 3,000 miles to Moscow. The size of the Russian work force is shrinking as the country grows older. China’s young — and growing — population is more than able to fill the gap and exploit these resources.
But there is no reason to believe that, over time, Moscow will simply let the region slip from its grasp. The territory at stake includes all of Russia’s access to the Pacific Ocean. Vladivostok is Russia’s only warm-water Pacific port. Nikolayevsk, at the mouth of the Amur River, processes most of Siberia’s remaining exports. Both are well within former Chinese territory.
The local Russian population is increasingly nervous. The governor of Primoskiy Kray, Yevgenii Nazdratenko, on June 1 called for relocating 5 million Russians from European Russia to the Far East.
Police in Russian cities are responding with aggressive ethnic profiling. Law enforcement personnel check the documentation of foreigners, and they actively target ethnic Asians. The policy results from a widespread feeling — as far away as St. Petersburg — that China is the source of undesirable immigration.
Peter Zeihan covers Russian issues for Stratfor.com, an Internet provider of global intelligence. Researcher Colin McRoberts contributed to this analysis from St. Petersburg, Russia.
A land without people for a people without land.” At the turn of the 20th century, that slogan promoted Jewish migration to Palestine. It could be recycled today, justifying a Chinese takeover of Siberia. Of course, Russia's Asian hinterland isn't really empty (and neither was Palestine). But Siberia is as resource-rich and people-poor as China is the opposite. The weight of that logic scares the Kremlin.
Moscow recently restored the Imperial Arch in the Far Eastern frontier town of Blagoveshchensk, declaring: “The earth along the Amur was, is and always will be Russian.” But Russia's title to all of the land is only about 150 years old. And the sprawl of highrises in Heihe, the Chinese boomtown on the south bank of the Amur, right across from Blagoveshchensk, casts doubt on the “always will be” part of the old czarist slogan.
Siberia – the Asian part of Russia, east of the Ural Mountains – is immense. It takes up three-quarters of Russia's land mass, the equivalent of the entire U.S. and India put together. It's hard to imagine such a vast area changing hands. But like love, a border is real only if both sides believe in it. And on both sides of the Sino-Russian border, that belief is wavering.
The border, all 2,738 miles of it, is the legacy of the Convention of Peking of 1860 and other unequal pacts between a strong, expanding Russia and a weakened China after the Second Opium War. (Other European powers similarly encroached upon China, but from the south. Hence the former British foothold in Hong Kong, for example.)
The 1.35 billion Chinese people south of the border outnumber Russia's 144 million almost 10 to 1. The discrepancy is even starker for Siberia on its own, home to barely 38 million people, and especially the border area, where only 6 million Russians face over 90 million Chinese. With intermarriage, trade and investment across that border, Siberians have realized that, for better or for worse, Beijing is a lot closer than Moscow.
The vast expanses of Siberia would provide not just room for China's huddled masses, now squeezed into the coastal half of their country by the mountains and deserts of western China. The land is already providing China, “the factory of the world,” with much of its raw materials, especially oil, gas and timber. Increasingly, Chinese-owned factories in Siberia churn out finished goods, as if the region already were a part of the Middle Kingdom's economy.
One day, China might want the globe to match the reality. In fact, Beijing could use Russia's own strategy: hand out passports to sympathizers in contested areas, then move in militarily to "protect its citizens." The Kremlin has tried that in Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and most recently the Crimea, all formally part of other post-Soviet states, but controlled by Moscow. And if Beijing chose to take Siberia by force, the only way Moscow could stop would be using nuclear weapons.
There is another path: Under Vladimir Putin, Russia is increasingly looking east for its future – building a Eurasian Union even wider than the one inaugurated recently in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, a staunch Moscow ally. Perhaps two existing blocs – the Eurasian one encompassing Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization – could unite China, Russia and most of the 'stans. Putin's critics fear that this economic integration would reduce Russia, especially Siberia, to a raw materials exporter beholden to Greater China. And as the Chinese learned from the humiliation of 1860, facts on the ground can become lines on the map.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/...ll-reclaim-siberia
Kommentar: mit den rußischen Rohstoffen ist die Einkreisung von China auch schwieriger.