Local.com aussichtsreich
Seite 3 von 373 Neuester Beitrag: 25.04.21 00:22 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 03.11.09 12:52 | von: Libuda | Anzahl Beiträge: | 10.314 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 25.04.21 00:22 | von: Franziskakuf. | Leser gesamt: | 653.604 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 8 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | 2 | | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... 373 > |
Why only 95 million for Local.com and 550 million for Yelp - but the revenues of Local.com near double of the reveneus of Yelp.
Yelp CEO says no IPO for “several years”
Jeremy Stoppelman, chief executive and co-founder of popular review site Yelp , let investors know on Thursday that the company won’t be looking for an IPO for several years. Yelp “will definitely not go public this year,” he said. “2011, who knows? But why rush out the door if I can avoid it?”, according to an article in the WSJ . Over the last couple of months there have been a whirlwind of activity involving Yelp. In mid-December of last year, rumors flew of talks between Google and Yelp for a possible buyout . While those proved to be just rumors, TechCrunch reported the potential deal at around $550 million plus earnouts .
Local.com Corporation(NasdaqCM: LOCM)
After Hours: 8.46 1.41 (20.00%) 4:44pm ET
Last Trade: 7.05
Trade Time: 4:00pm ET
Change: 0.34 (5.07%)
Prev Close: 6.71
Open: 6.72
Bid: 6.56 x 500
Ask: 8.95 x 3000
1y Target Est: 10.00
Day's Range: 6.68 - 7.26
52wk Range: 2.15 - 7.26
Volume: 253,088
Avg Vol (3m): 105,392
Market Cap: 103.07M
P/E (ttm): N/A
EPS (ttm):
Ganz wesentlich geholfen hat mir die dabei die Beschäftigung mit dem deutschen Wert "Abacho", der im Vergleich zu deisem Wert völlig überbewertet war und nachwievor ist.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/...beats-estimates-again?source=yahoo
Das gilt erst recht, wenn man das mit so manchen deutschen Internetwert vergleicht.
Hier ein paar Daten zu Open Table:
OpenTable, Inc.(NasdaqGM: OPEN)
Real-Time: 37.92 1.00 (2.71%) 12:40PM ET
Last Trade: 38.01
Trade Time: 12:38PM ET
Change: 1.09 (2.95%)
Prev Close: 36.92
Open: 37.18
Bid: 37.88 x 300
Ask: 38.06 x 100
1y Target Est: 36.43
Day's Range: 36.91 - 38.36
52wk Range: 24.04 - 38.74
Volume: 65,201
Avg Vol (3m): 180,656
Market Cap: 858.34M
P/E (ttm): 171.22
EPS (ttm): 0.22
Div & Yield: N/A (N/A)
Hätte Local.com eine Open Table vergleichbare Bewertung, müsste der Kurs über 50 Dollar liegen.
View: Annual Data | Quarterly Data All numbers in thousands
PERIOD ENDING 31-Dec-09 30-Sep-09 30-Jun-09 31-Mar-09
Total Revenue 16,364 15,128 13,726 11,064
Cost of Revenue - - 1,011 1,109
Gross Profit 16,364 15,128 13,726 11,064
Operating Expenses
Research Development 988 964 735 856
Selling General and Administrative 14,368 13,636 12,601 12,711
Non Recurring - - - -
Others 723 722 724 355
Total Operating Expenses - - - -
Operating Income or Loss 285 (194) (334) (2,858)
http://www.local.com/
Da macht es dann sind eine Branche zu wählen und dann auch einmal die Voreinstellung "Los Angeles" zu wechseln. Die von mir im folgenden angeführten Searches sind nur die am häufigsten gewählten - es gibt natürlich noch sehr viel mehr Sparten. Das gilt auch für die Top-Cities - wie umfangreich man hier differenzieren kann, werde ich im nächsten Posting anschließen.
Top Searches:
•§events |
•§ac contractors |
•§attorneys |
•§auto dealers |
•§auto rental |
•§auto repair |
•§general contractors |
•§hair salon |
•§hardware stores |
•§pest control |
•§pet shop
Top Cities:
•§New York |
•§Atlanta |
•§Chicago |
•§Los Angeles |
•§Houston |
•§Tampa |
•§Miami |
•§Philadelphia |
•§Dallas |
Search for Local Businesses by City
Please select a city
•§Alaska
•§Anchorage
•§Juneau
•§Alabama
•§Birmingham
•§Huntsville
•§Mobile
•§Montgomery
•§Arkansas
•§Little Rock
•§Arizona
•§Chandler
•§Gilbert
•§Glendale
•§Mesa
•§Peoria
•§Phoenix
•§Scottsdale
•§Tempe
•§Tucson
•§California
•§Anaheim
•§Bakersfield
•§Berkeley
•§Burbank
•§Chula Vista
•§Concord
•§Corona
•§Costa Mesa
•§Daly City
•§Downey
•§El Monte
•§Escondido
•§Fontana
•§Fremont
•§Fresno
•§Fullerton
•§Garden Grove
•§Glendale
•§Huntington Beach
•§Inglewood
•§Irvine
•§Lancaster
•§Long Beach
•§Los Angeles
•§Moreno Valley
•§Norwalk
•§Oakland
•§Oceanside
•§Ontario
•§Orange
•§Oxnard
•§Palmdale
•§Pasadena
•§Pomona
•§Rancho Cucamonga
•§Riverside
•§Sacramento
•§San Bernardino
•§San Diego
•§San Francisco
•§San Jose
•§Santa Ana
•§Santa Clara
•§Santa Clarita
•§Simi Valley
•§Sunnyvale
•§Thousand Oaks
•§Torrance
•§West Covina
•§Colorado
•§Arvada
•§Aurora
•§Colorado Springs
•§Denver
•§Fort Collins
•§Lakewood
•§Pueblo
•§Thornton
•§Westminster
•§Connecticut
•§Bridgeport
•§Hartford
•§New Haven
•§Stamford
•§Waterbury
•§District Of Columbia
•§Washington
•§Delaware
•§Dover
•§Wilmington
•§Florida
•§Cape Coral
•§Clearwater
•§Coral Springs
•§Fort Lauderdale
•§Gainesville
•§Hialeah
•§Hollywood
•§Jacksonville
•§Miami
•§Miramar
•§Orlando
•§Pembroke Pines
•§Pompano Beach
•§Port Saint Lucie
•§St Petersburg
•§Tallahassee
•§Tampa
•§Georgia
•§Athens
•§Atlanta
•§Augusta
•§Columbus
•§Savannah
•§Hawaii
•§Honolulu
•§Iowa
•§Cedar Rapids
•§Des Moines
•§Idaho
•§Boise
•§Illinois
•§Aurora
•§Chicago
•§Elgin
•§Joliet
•§Naperville
•§Peoria
•§Rockford
•§Springfield
•§Indiana
•§Evansville
•§Fort Wayne
•§Indianapolis
•§South Bend
•§Kansas
•§Kansas City
•§Olathe
•§Overland Park
•§Topeka
•§Wichita
•§Kentucky
•§Lexington
•§Louisville
•§Louisiana
•§Baton Rouge
•§Lafayette
•§New Orleans
•§Shreveport
•§Massachusetts
•§Boston
•§Cambridge
•§Lowell
•§Springfield
•§Worcester
•§Maryland
•§Baltimore
•§Maine
•§Augusta
•§Michigan
•§Ann Arbor
•§Detroit
•§Flint
•§Grand Rapids
•§Lansing
•§Sterling Heights
•§Warren
•§Minnesota
•§Minneapolis
•§Missouri
•§Independence
•§Kansas City
•§Saint Louis
•§Springfield
•§Mississippi
•§Jackson
•§Montana
•§Billings
•§North Carolina
•§Cary
•§Charlotte
•§Durham
•§Fayetteville
•§Greensboro
•§Raleigh
•§Winston-Salem
•§North Dakota
•§Bismarck
•§Nebraska
•§Lincoln
•§Omaha
•§New Hampshire
•§Manchester
•§New Jersey
•§Elizabeth
•§Jersey City
•§Newark
•§Paterson
•§New Mexico
•§Albuquerque
•§Nevada
•§Henderson
•§Las Vegas
•§North Las Vegas
•§Reno
•§New York
•§Albany
•§Brookhaven
•§Buffalo
•§New York City
•§Oyster Bay
•§Rochester
•§Syracuse
•§Yonkers
•§Ohio
•§Akron
•§Cincinnati
•§Cleveland
•§Columbus
•§Dayton
•§Toledo
•§Oklahoma
•§Norman
•§Oklahoma City
•§Tulsa
•§Oregon
•§Portland
•§Salem
•§Pennsylvania
•§Allentown
•§Erie
•§Philadelphia
•§Pittsburgh
•§Rhode Island
•§Providence
•§South Carolina
•§Charleston
•§Columbia
•§South Dakota
•§Sioux Falls
•§Tennessee
•§Chattanooga
•§Clarksville
•§Knoxville
•§Memphis
•§Nashville
•§Texas
•§Abilene
•§Amarillo
•§Arlington
•§Austin
•§Beaumont
•§Brownsville
•§Carrollton
•§Corpus Christi
•§Dallas
•§Denton
•§El Paso
•§Fort Worth
•§Garland
•§Grand Prairie
•§Irving
•§Killeen
•§Laredo
•§Lubbock
•§McAllen
•§McKinney
•§Mesquite
•§Midland
•§Pasadena
•§Plano
•§San Antonio
•§Waco
•§Utah
•§Provo
•§Salt Lake City
•§West Valley
•§Virginia
•§Alexandria
•§Arlington
•§Chesapeake
•§Hampton
•§Newport News
•§Norfolk
•§Portsmouth
•§Richmond
•§Virginia Beach
•§Vermont
•§Montpelier
•§Washington
•§Bellevue
•§Seattle
•§Spokane
•§Tacoma
•§Vancouver
•§Wisconsin
•§Green Bay
•§Madison
•§Milwaukee
•§West Virginia
•§Charleston
•§Wyoming
•§Cheyenne
Und die gestern gemeldeten Ergebnisse sind derart excellent, dass meines Erachtens die Kursverdoppelung gegenüber dem Startkurs von 3,60 Euro nicht mehr lange auf sich warten lässt:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...irst-bw-2846796622.html?x=0&.v=1
First Quarter Operating and Recent Highlights:
Renewed and Expanded SuperMedia Agreement – At the end of the first quarter the company and SuperMedia LLC, home to Superpages.com, announced an expanded local advertising distribution agreement effective April 1, 2010. The expanded agreement is expected to increase the monetization of the company’s search traffic by providing an increased number of Superpages.com’s advertiser listings in response to search requests on Local.com and its distribution network.
Acquired up to 8,032 Subscription Customers – In April 2010, the company announced that it acquired up to 8,032 web hosting subscribers for approximately $800,000 in cash.
Owned & Operated:
Revenue – In Q1 2010 the total revenue related to the O&O business unit was $10.7 million, up 13% from Q4 2009 O&O revenue of $9.5 million.
Traffic – In Q1 2010 O&O traffic was 47 million monthly unique visitors (MUVs), up 4% from 45 million MUVs for Q4 2009.
Organic Traffic – O&O organic traffic was 4.6 million MUVs in Q1 2010, down 10% from Q4 2009 MUVs of 5.1 million. Organic traffic is defined as all non-SEM sourced traffic on owned and operated websites.
Monetization of Traffic – Revenue per thousand visitors (RKV) for Q1 2010 was $260, up 1% from Q4 2009 RKV of $257.
Network:
Revenue – In Q1 2010 the total revenue related to the Network business unit was $5.2 million, up 3% from Q4 2009 Network revenue of $5.0 million.
Local Syndication Network (“LSN”) Traffic – In Q1 2010 LSN traffic was 16 million MUVs, down 18% from 19 million MUVs for Q4 2009.
Network Sites – The company ended Q1 2010 with over 849 Network sites from over 139 partners.
Sales & Advertiser Services:
Revenue – In Q1 2010 the total revenue related to the SAS business unit was $2.7 million, up 46% from Q4 2009 SAS revenue of $1.9 million.
Acquired 10,000 Subscription Customers – In February 2010, the company announced that it acquired approximately 10,000 web hosting subscribers for approximately $1.6 million in cash.
Record Small Business Subscribers – The company ended the first quarter of 2010 with over 48,000 small business subscribers.
Second Quarter 2010 Financial Guidance:
Revenue - The company expects second quarter 2010 revenue of $20.0 million to $21.0 million.
Adjusted Net Income - Adjusted Net Income for Q2 2010 is expected to be between $2.6 million to $2.8 million or between $0.16 to $0.17 per diluted share.
http://isht.comdirect.de/html/detail/...amp;sCat=STK&sSym=OTQ.FSE
Aber besser als gar keine.
Sollten die Kaufsummen, die z.B. für Yelp geboten wurden stimmen, ist der oben dokumentierte Kursanstieg noch lange nicht das Ende der Fahnenstange, denn wir whaben nachwievor ein extrem niedriges Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis - ganz egal, ob ich das mit Amiwerten oder deutschen Werten vergleiche.
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/...46812&tof=1&frt=2#146812
On Wednesday June 2, 2010, 4:27 pm EDT
IRVINE, Calif. (AP) -- Local.com Corp., a search-engine operator, boosted its second-quarter and full-year financial forecast Wednesday, sending its stock higher.
The company said it is now expecting to report second-quarter revenue of between $22.3 million and $22.8 million, up from a previous forecast of $20 million to $21 million.
Given the higher revenue, the company said it will earn between $3.3 million and $3.5 million, excluding adjusted earnings, or between 19 cents and 20 cents per share. That compares with a previous estimate of $2.6 million to $2.8 million or between 16 cents and 17 cents per share.
The new forecast is better than analysts expected. The average estimate is for 17 cents per share on revenue of $20.6 million, according to Thomson Reuters.
Local.com shares jumped 84 cents, or 11 percent, to close at $8.32.
For the full-year Local.com is now shooting for revenue of $87 million to $90 million, up from $81 million to $84 million. Analysts expect $82.8 million, on average.
http://isht.comdirect.de/html/detail/...Jcfcode=41124&x=9&y=4