Trading Bougainville Copper (ADRs) 867948
Seite 169 von 980 Neuester Beitrag: 09.11.24 23:27 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 29.09.07 00:25 | von: nekro | Anzahl Beiträge: | 25.491 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 09.11.24 23:27 | von: Fuchsbau24 | Leser gesamt: | 5.902.910 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 2.366 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 167 | 168 | | 170 | 171 | ... 980 > |
Vielleicht ist die Entwicklung hinter den Kulissen schon weiter, als das Publikum erkennt ?
Auf der Pazifikinsel Bougainville, einer ehemals deutschen Kolonie, tobte lange Zeit eine sogenannte Kokosnuss-Revolution um eine riesige Kupfermine, die 15 000 Menschen das Leben kostete. Der britisch-australische Rohstoffgigant Rio Tinto bemüht sich um die Wiederaufnahme der dortigen Produktion.
Have a nice w/end!
auf den Artikel in der Zeitschrift "DER AKTIONÄR" !
Alle Zitate auf: www.bougainville-copper.eu
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/...mp;mid=9943&tof=12&frt=2
Rate it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You have rated *****
-Aufhebung des Miningmoratoriums
-Uebertragung der Miningpower von PNG ans ABG
-Uebertragung des 19% Anteils an BCL von PNG an Bougainville (oder eines Teils davon)
-Go fuer die Verhandlungen zu einem neuen BCA
-Ueberweisung der noch ausstehenden 15 Mill Kina von PNG ans ABG (mit einem Teil der Summe soll den Meekamuis das "Weapons disposal" schmackhaft gemacht werden.
- Im Anschluss daran: Einladung des ABG an BCL die Mine zu besichtigen
-Ueberweisung der für 88-89 noch ausstehenden Royaltys von BCL an die Panguna Landowners
-Offizielle Uebergabe der Pangunamine an BCL
So langsam tritt die BCL Spekulation in ihre heisse Phase.Aktuell wechseln die Shares in die Hände von Investoren,welche das BCL Potential im Falle der Wiedereröffnung bietet
erkannt haben.
Dass die Wiedereröffnung schon längst beschlossen ist u. nur noch auf ihre Umsetzung wartet ist inzwischen Fakt. ;-))))
schaut euch dochmal die RIO/CRA oder z. Bsp. BHP Notierungen vom Ende der 80´er an, und vergleicht sie mit den heutigen,
und stellt daneben die BCL-Kurse,
kann man finden,
demnach müssten BCL, wenn denn in Betrieb, zwischen 30 und 50 AUD stehen,
und, wenn denn wirklich laufend, die anderen Linzensen ein Vermögen wert sein, deren Einfluß auf den Aktienkurs kaum vorhersehbar ist,
Gruß joebo
http://channel6newsonline.com/2010/08/...-new-guinea-no-tsunami-risk/
PORT MORESBY, PAPUA NEW GUINEA (BNO NEWS) -- A strong earthquake struck offshore Papua New Guinea's Bougainville region on early Saturday morning, seismologists said, but there were no reports of damage or casualties.
The 6.4-magnitude earthquake at 3.56 a.m. local time (1756 GMT Friday) was centered about 165 km (105 miles) west southwest of Arawa, a city in Bougainville region. It struck approximately 50.9 kilometers (31.6 miles) deep, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
There were no immediate reports of damage or casualties from the earthquake and no tsunami warnings where issued.
genau ,so stell ich mir das vor" joebo" 30-50 ist dann doch mein Kursziel ,dachte zuerst 11 aber du hast mich total überzeugt mit deinen 40....oder sooo.let`s rock.
50`s coming schönes we allen investierten und zukünftigen
CHEERS
http://www.undervaluedshares.com/de/data/pdfs/...ville-Copper.pdf.zip
Alleine die Reserven der Pangunamine rechtfertigen einen Kurs von 8-10 AUD wenn der Beschluss zur Wiedereröffnung der Pangunamine offiziell gefasst u. von allen Beteiligten unterstützt wird
Kurs leicht über 7 (damals DM), Dividende (damals) 0,49 DM,
ein Grund für mich, die ersten Stücke zu erwerben,
sollte sich eine solche Ausschütungspolitik fortsetzen - und die wird wohl damals wie heute ggf. von RIO bestimmt,
so werden sich einige Anleger sicher überlegen, ob ein Verkauf nicht die schlechtere Alternative ist,
stützt den Kurs dann evt. zusätzlich,
immer vorausgesetzt, ABG und PNG und BCL kriegen das Ding´ ans Laufen,
Gruß joebo
Revenue of USD2,505 M less operating cost of USD901 M less landowners royalty of USD88 M
Earnings Before Interest and Tax [EBIT] = 1516 M; Interest payable in Year 1on USD3.5 B = USD187.2 Million
Profit Before Tax [PBT] = 1516-187 = USD 1329 M,
Tax at 30% = USD398.7 M or K 1,139 M
Profit After Tax [PAT] = USD 930.3 M; EPS = USD2.32 per share
Loan repayment year 1 = USD212 M
Dividends = USD 718.3 M or USD 1.79 per share [or K5.12 per share]
If the company was a going concern operating at full production with no uncertainty about start-up, BCA, financing the Market Capitalisation of the company would be USD12 x 930.3 M or USD 11,164 M on a P/E of 12 or USD 10,612 M on a Price/EBIT of 7.
A market capitalization of USD10.6 Billion would imply an intrinsic value of USD26.46 [or K75.6] per share. This assumes the company will not issue any new shares and will finance the mine development wholly via bonds.
@joebo
"so werden sich einige Anleger sicher überlegen, ob ein Verkauf nicht die schlechtere Alternative ist"
Da hast du sicher recht,trotzdem würde ich mich dann mit 99,9999% BOC im Depot etwas unwohl fühlen. ;-)))))))
By John Bowermaster
If you think the long-term impact of the Deepwater Horizon explosion is going to be harmful on countless fronts, wait until the ocean floor is harvested for copper, nickel, gold, silver, cobalt and other minerals a mile below the surface.
If the Chinese have their way, that’s just what is about to happen in international waters in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Papua, New Guinea.
So-called “deep-sea mining” was first proposed as far back as the mid-1960s, in a book called Mineral Resources of the Seas by J.L. Mero. He described the potential as “limitless.”
Over the next 20 years, the U.S., Germany, France and others spent hundreds of millions of dollars investigating the possibilities. The Convention on the Law of the Sea created anInternational Seabed Authority to oversee potential mines. In recent years, the possibility of mining the ocean floor 4,000 to 9,000 feet below the surface has been seriously considered, especially in countries with booming populations (and thus booming resource needs).
Now China has applied for a permit.
The Chinese are willing to pay for the risky and expensive operation, and a Canadian company, Nautilus Minerals, has agreed to undertake the labor.
In some respects the effort itself is not so different from mining on land. Deposits would be mined using either hydraulic pumps or bucket systems—essentially giant conveyor belts running from the sea floor to waiting ships above.
Is a mile down really where we want to start making cracks to extract more resources?
Thanks to the BP debacle, the world now has a slightly better idea of what exactly goes on a mile below the ocean’s surface. According to the few scientists who’ve taken a look at the potential for ocean mining, there’s obvious concern. Maurice Tivey, a Woods Hole geologist, says, “It’s a unique set of life down there. Frankly, we haven’t found everything. We need to make sure we go in with our eyes wide open.”
The most likely source of riches is near inactive hydrothermal vents, which are giant cracks in the ocean floor. The vents, known as “black smokers,” are chimney-like structures, home to their own little biospheres. Nautilus has identified the waters off Papua, New Guinea as rich with gold, copper and zinc. (Diamonds are already being taken from beneath the surface off the coast of Africa, but just a few hundred feet below.)
The true costs, both monetary and environmental, are yet to be discovered. All mines create waste and these will be no different. Disrupting the ocean floor in such a major way is an unknown, as are the invariable impacts on the food chain. But damage is certain. Waters will be polluted with toxic chemicals; piles of extracted tailings will need a home; and, undoubtedly, there will be leaks. Plant and animal life around the sites will be at great risk thanks to great plumes of sediment that will result.
Right now the best answer to what to do with the mine’s waste is to return it to the site of the mine—a mile below the surface—continuing man’s awful tendency to continue to rely on “out of sight, out of mind” technology.
Back in 2006, when deep sea mining was first publicly debated, Toronto geologist Steven Scott said that concerns about the potential environmental harms were a “knee jerk reaction” and that mining below the sea could be less destructive than on land.
Today Richard Harrington of the Marine Conservation Society suggests knee-jerk may be the best reaction.
“Deep-sea mining would take this sort of damage to a new level in the wider oceans. Conditions at this depth are normally very stable and any mining damage would impact the environment for a very long time.”
After 93+ days of watching oil gush from the ocean floor due to man’s overreaching for natural resources, concerns about what goes on below the ocean’s surface seem far more real today.
Maybe the BP tragedy will teach us something after all
http://econgeol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/73/5/721
Da ist die These irgendwann in der Pangunamine mit dem Untertagebau zu beginnen garnicht so weit hergeholt ;-)))))))))))
http://www.rohstoff-welt.de/news/artikel.php?sid=21014
Postings: 4.219
Zugriffe: 387.303
Wenn die Anzahl der Zugriffe : 100 die Zahl der Postings bullisch kreuzt hat BOC die 1 durchbrochen und steht über 5 Jahreshoch.
2. Item # 8 is Establishment of Committees for BCA review
3. Item # 7 is Review of Bougainville Peace Agreement
Cheers
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-23/...r-months-customs-say.html
...inklusive aktuelles Statement auf www.bougainville-copper.eu !
By Aloysius Laukai
The Department of Mineral Policy and Geo Hazard Management last week conducted a one week preparatory workshop with the Bougainville Administration’s Senior officials.
The delegation was led by Deputy National Secretary of the Department MR. SHEDRICK HIMATA.
The workshop was important and necessary in preparation for the forthcoming review of the Bougainville Copper Agreement.
The purpose of the workshop was to get information from the Bougainville officials on:
How the review should be conducted,
Who the participants will be in the review,
Who should facilitate and chair the review,
The terms and reference of the facilitators and format of the review.
The Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) WOULD REQUEST THE National Government at this week’s JSB meeting to conduct the PANGUNA baseline survey prior to the review of the Bougainville Copper Agreement.
The baseline survey would be conducted by scientists funded by the World Bank.
The current understanding is that the landowners have agreed to review the BCL agreement before mining could resume in Panguna.
Das BCA REVIEW - und damit die mögliche Aufnahme des Bergbaus in Panguna - geht in die nächste Runde. Diese Runde ist wichtig für den Zeitplan.
Es bleibt spannend - nahezu dramatisch.