Raya Group
Bis 2020 wollen sie 15 % Marktanteil erreichen...bei einem Marktvolumen von 1 Trillion. Wow !
einiges los heute nacht Trading Halt und neue Präsentation: http://hotcopper.com.au/...zFkiWRTLKhOROKAxjvQk4M5g20pnKfp5lJ2%2Fk%3D
dann noch: http://hotcopper.com.au/...zFkiWRTLKhOROKAxjvQk4M5gq5pnKfp5lJ2%2Fk%3D
muss erstmal kucken. KTM unterstützt Raya u.a. bei der Roadshow
Für Urlaub bleibt da wohl bis auf weiteres keine Zeit
Dabei wurde die schon lang angekündigt. Letztes Mal am 20.11.15 Und es wurde auch mitgeteilt das sie zwischen 3 und 10mio sein wird. So wie es jetzt ausschaut, haben die neuen Shares einen Kurs von ca. 4cent. Find ich ganz ok.
& let the dump begin!!!..IMO this will get destroyed today. IMO the iot asx space is becoming cluttered meaning there's probly another 30 xped's waiting in the wings. There's probly 1000 programmers engineers at Microsoft,Google, university etc who could develop this type of tech at any time. The China patent is like giving a thief a bank managers job. What's so hard about getting of your ass and turning on appliances without yout iPad...IMO the iot fad will fade away. Who's gonna pay someone for the right to complete mundane tasks....
alles klar soweit?
viele Grüße
Just contemplating the possibility of Raya and Qualcomm , John Stefanac appears to have a relationship with Adrian Fu (Qualcomm) where they exchange banter and one would take it as friends on Facebook except now the last few hours you can't find the dialogue on Stefanacs account but you can read it on Fu's account between the two of them . I was already told this but had to research for some verification.There is no historical dialogue I can find , so it appears they have just started communicating. I myself wouldn't parade a relationship like this publicly if I was collaborating with a rival company not with somebody like Fu a Qualcomm heavyweight.With Qualcomms business rellationship with Samsung
opens my imagination up as earlier Xped said they had some Koreans looking at their ADRC.
I'm not holding my breathe either way (read the news on Samsung and Qualcomm in Asian papers etc its not all rosy ) but they have a very strong business relationship where they appear to know how to work together when they have too. I dream of Samsung adopting this technology they could truly leapfrog this into a world beater. But its just a thought could be nothing and thats when I say WTF , definately I will be watching this with more interest though Already had a few unhappy roosta's with my earlier post, says something doesn't it
http://hotcopper.com.au/threads/....2652857/page-150?post_id=16590285
My younger brother is a senior corporate IT guy at one of the big aussie banks, I emailed him the latest preso and his immediate comparison was to Netscape and its effect on bringing the internet to the masses. In much the same way either Xped or something like Xped will be necessary to bring IoT to the masses.
Back in the very early days on the internet I did not understand why there was a need for Netscape at all. I recall asking little brother why, if there are thousands of websites on the internet already why do we need another website that is not on any comapany's behalf. Why not go straight to the website you want in the first place. To which my brother replied you are thinking about now, give it a few months / years and there will be millions upon millions of websites and you will need a browser to find, not only what you are looking for but to suggest websites for you that you didn't know you were looking for in the first place.
I found all this quite amusing in the slow dial up / pre-mobile phone era. Sure Netscape didn't become the defacto browser standard but it did reach a market cap of $10bn with almost no revenue as the market speculated on its ability to monetise it first mover position on the web.
Now back to IoT.
Qualcomm and Samsung would be a fairly obvious place to start if you happen to be the CEO of a universal IoT tech firm who, in a previous life just happened to be an extremely senior corporate exec at Qualcomm for the Asia/Pac region where Samsung rules supreme in many consumer and industrial sectors.
I imagine our CEO has one of those useful folders in which he keeps the business cards of all the senior Asia/Pac execs he has met while running Qualcomm's operations there.
http://hotcopper.com.au/threads/...fo.2659250/page-4?post_id=16590245
Dazu braucht es sicher einige Geduld, aber bei den derzeitigen Zinsen kann man sein Geld ja auch gleich unter die Matratze legen...oder hier investieren.
Wenn Xped bis 2020 einen Marktanteil von MINDESTENS 15 % erreichen sollte, dann reden wir hier auf jeden Fall über Milliarden und nicht Millionen.
Da haben die neue Präsentation und die Roadshow jetzt vielleicht doch was bewegt ?!!
Australia needs to be in vanguard of Internet of Things
Date
October 18, 2015
Kate Burleigh
Malcolm Turnbull can recognise the potential by commissioning the development of a national Internet of Things strategy.
Sensors are being rolled out across the backs of four Tasmanian swarms this summer in world-first CSIRO research to track the movements of thousands of bees in the wild.
The Internet of Things (IoT) will fundamentally reshape our economy within our lifetimes.
What appear to be contemporary seismic economic shifts in the form of ride-sharing services, accommodation apps, and online retail will, in retrospect, look like preliminary tremors.
The question for governments around Australia is whether or not to be active or passive in managing the process. The ACT is admirably showing a preference for the former.
The new smart-parking pilot in Manuka, which will see drivers connected via their smartphones to the availability of car spaces may seem like a modest, albeit useful, innovation.
But it is, in reality, a leading Australian step in embracing the Internet of Things, a development that British Prime Minister David Cameron has declared the "new Industrial Revolution".
And while Britain may be uniquely qualified to judge industrial revolutions, it is hardly alone in diverting attention and resources to the shift. China, Singapore, Brazil, Germany, Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates – all have established national strategies around IoT.
Yet in Australia discourse about IoT has too often become snagged on 1990s ideas about fridges that can order milk and web browsers built into washing machines.
IoT is not primarily about gadgetry or screens – it is about creating data and using it to solve problems.
Technology now exists, and is being improved exponentially, to allow everyday objects to communicate with each other over the internet.
Tiny sophisticated sensors, similar to the ones being installed in Manuka, can be attached to anything – buildings, cars, fields, animals, people.
Such is the speed of progress that some 50 billion devices are projected to connect to the internet by 2020.
The many "things" we created via the first industrial revolution are set to become an integrated network via the second.
The potential such data opens up for economic productivity, innovation, and quality of life more broadly is near infinite.
Sensors on cars, roads, and parking spots could eliminate traffic congestion. Sensors on farms could facilitate more efficient crop cultivation. Sensors on people could keep track of medical data for use on a personal and societal level.
The data these devices will generate will, in effect, become a rich new resource to be mined for economic return. The winners in the global economy will be those who can leverage this new resource most effectively.
Governments – federal, state, and local – should have a good idea of what they want the Internet of Things to mean for Australia, and what they want to avoid.
This might involve making government data available to innovative start-ups, making government agencies strategic customers for new innovations, and ensuring there is adequate network bandwidth. In terms of regulations, data security and interoperability need to be ensured at the outset.
Nations across the globe are realising this and there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia to join them.
Our efforts, however, will need to be strategically aimed. It will not be possible to simply throw support behind all aspects of IoT innovation.
For example, the Singaporean government wants the city state to become the world's first "smart" nation by attaching sensors to every corner of the country. Australia's vast continent might not be able to compete on that front – but our major cities could transform into smart cities. And we could, potentially, be IoT pacesetters in areas where we have a comparative advantage – agriculture, resources and finance, for example. Simultaneously, we could be strategic early adopters of other innovations being developed around the world.
The other means through which government can assist is education. A lot of recent debate has focused on teaching coding in schools, and it is true we need more young Australians to speak the language of computers. But more broadly, we need to foster an education system that encourages students to usedata to solve problems and to create their own solutions. In a data-rich world, the next generation needs to become skilled at recognisingwhat is the signal and what is noise.
There are some encouraging signs of our potential on a national level. The CSIRO, for example, is leading international research on preventing the decline of honey bees, whose pollination efforts are critical to securing global food security. By attaching tiny RFID tags to bees and analysing the data, Australian scientists are able to monitor bees' movement and behaviour in a way that has never been possible in the past.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has said he wants to "ensure that all Australians understand that their government recognises the opportunities of the future and is putting in place the policies and the plans to enable them to take advantage of it".
A good place to start then would be to commission the development of a national Internet of Things strategy, to identify strategic areas of focus as well as challenges.
Such a strategy will require, far-sightedness, inclusiveness, and sophisticated thinking. But no one claimed industrial revolutions were easy.
Kate Burleigh is managing director of Intel Australia.
Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/...20151016-gkau1t.html#ixzz3u0BLxQ7s
ich habe bewusst einige Tage mit meinem Posting gewartet, da ich die Kommentare einer bestimmten Person nicht kommentieren wollte...
Mit der Woche können wir durchaus zufrieden sein. Das eine Konsolidierung kommen würde, lag ja auf der Hand. Dadurch sind einige Anleger nochmal aufgesprungen. Sehr schön. Viele Tech-Aktien an der ASX sind binnen kurzer Zeit gigantisch gestiegen, um danach deutlich nachzugeben. Bei RYG ist die Situation anders. Wir sehen einen gesunden Aufwärtstrend (siehe Chart auf 4Trader). Wir alle warten natürlich, auf die Mega-News. Ihr wisst was ich meine... Ich denke, das die noch vor Weihnachten kommen wird. Dann werden wir 0,10 Aus sehen !!!
Deine Analyse kann ich zur 100% bestätigen.... seh ich genauso.
Ist es nicht genauso wie beim König der spiele ? Wennn ihr mal Lust auf eine echte intellektuelle Auseinandersetzung in form einer gepflegten Partie Fernschach habt,seid ihr als Gegener in meinem Ariva schachthread selbstverständlich herzlich willkommen,da können wir neben schach sowie auch über alle mal reden,hier gehts lang:
http://www.ariva.de/forum/...ovisorium-463012?new_pnr=20346829#bottom
Viele Grüsse !