die neue Greenshift - auf zu alten Höhen ?
Seite 12 von 43 Neuester Beitrag: 24.04.21 23:08 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 15.02.08 11:35 | von: Matzelbub | Anzahl Beiträge: | 2.062 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 24.04.21 23:08 | von: Jessicagxwc. | Leser gesamt: | 131.281 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 31 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... 43 > |
In the United States, naked short selling is covered by various SEC regulations which prohibit the practice.[3] In 2005, "Regulation SHO" was enacted, requiring that broker-dealers have grounds to believe that shares will be available for a given stock transaction, and requiring that delivery take place within a limited time period.[4][5] As part of its response to the crisis in the North American markets in 2008, the SEC issued a temporary order restricting short-selling in the shares of 19 financial firms deemed systemically important, by reinforcing the penalties for failing to deliver the shares in time.[6] Effective September 18, 2008, amid claims that aggressive short selling had played a role in the failure of financial giant Lehman Brothers, the SEC extended and expanded the rules to remove exceptions and to cover all companies.[7][8]
Some commentators have contended that despite regulations, naked shorting is widespread and that the SEC regulations are poorly enforced. The SEC has denied these claims. However, the SEC and others have also defended the practice in limited form as beneficial for market liquidity.[4] Its critics have contended that the practice is susceptible to abuse, can be damaging to targeted companies struggling to raise capital, and has led to numerous bankruptcies.[3][7][9]
quelle:wikipedia
l8er
bbb
wer nicht hört verbrennt sich die finger...imo
Bin selbst investiert ...aber vergesst es...