SPONGETECH
Seite 101 von 109 Neuester Beitrag: 25.04.21 02:35 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 08.06.08 01:50 | von: _bbb_ | Anzahl Beiträge: | 3.702 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 25.04.21 02:35 | von: Stefanieitaja | Leser gesamt: | 278.540 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 52 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 98 | 99 | 100 | | 102 | 103 | 104 | ... 109 > |
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/...UPVT6z7g0L0rxZs4MvFiDAW2HJA
http://ih.advfn.com/...328849&article=42537725&symbol=NO^SPNG
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/...dwZwtuF7toIByJl1X4zx-JYohSA
dann ja
ansonsten versteh ich die frage oder den link falsch
good luck
SpongeTech(R) Delivery Systems, Inc. Announces an Audio Interview With ChartPoppers.com
PR Newswire
NEW YORK, April 28
NEW YORK, April 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --
SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc., The Smarter Sponge™, (Pink Sheets: SPNG), announces that ChartPoppers.com has a new audio interview with SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc. COO Steven Moskowitz. To listen to the entire interview visit: http://ChartPoppers.com/iReports.
The Company will continue to update its progress with its shareholders.
About SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc.
SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc. is a public company which designs, produces, and markets unique lines multi-usage cleaning products for Car Care, Child Care, Home Care, Marine Care and Pet Care usages. These sponge-like products utilize SpongeTech®'s proprietary, patent (and patent-pending) technologies and other technologies involving hydrophilic (liquid absorbing) foam, polyurethane matrices or other ingredients. The Company's sponge-like products are pre-loaded with specially formulated ingredients such as soap, conditioner and/or wax that are released when the sponge is soaked and applied to a surface with minimal pressure. SpongeTech® is currently exploring additional applications for its technology in the health, beauty, and medical markets. SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc. intends to globally brand its products as The Smarter Sponge™.
Dicon Technologies, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, located in Black Creek, Georgia, has a product line that currently focuses within the cosmetic, footwear, and medical markets. Dicon's cosmetic product line utilizes a patented, latex-free hydrophilic foam material in a wide variety of sizes and shapes for Dicon's "Just For You®" line as well as several private label brands. Dicon products include applicators, cleansing sponges, buffs, puffs, and wedges for various skin care and cosmetic applications.
Safe Harbor Statement
Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements in this news release that relate to the Company's expectations with regard to the future impact on the Company's results are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The results anticipated by any or all of these forward-looking statements may not occur. Additional risks and uncertainties are set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2008 and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the third quarter ended February 28, 2009. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the Company's plans or expectations.
About ChartPoppers.com
ChartPoppers.com is a small-cap research and investment commentary provider. ChartPoppers.com strives to provide a balanced view of many promising small-cap companies that would otherwise fall under the radar of the typical Wall Street investor. We provide investors with an excellent first step in their research and due diligence by providing daily trading ideas, and consolidating the public information available on them. For more information on ChartPoppers, please visit: http://ChartPoppers.com
ChartPoppers.com Disclosure
ChartPoppers.com is not a registered investment advisor and nothing contained in any materials should be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. ChartPoppers.com is a Web site wholly owned by Seo Freisin, Inc. ChartPoppers.com nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in the mentioned company; nor have they received compensation of any kind for any of the companies listed in this communication. Please read our report and visit our Web site, ChartPoppers.com, for complete risks and disclosures.
Contact:
SpongeTech® Delivery Systems, Inc.
Investor Relations
1-877-776-6438
ir@spongetech.com
SOURCE SpongeTech(R) Delivery Systems, Inc.
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=JDduC2mKjdsvrnmgrngOuYh4l5k2TGxc
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The top executives of Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc.
(SPNG) were arrested and charged Wednesday in an alleged scheme to defraud
investors by reporting falsely and grossly overstated sales figures.
According to a criminal complaint filed Wednesday, Michael Metter,
Spongetech's chief executive, and Steven Moskowitz, the cleaning-products
maker's chief operating officer, were charged with conspiracy to commit
securities fraud and obstruction of justice.
Metter, 58 years old, of Greenwich, Conn., and Moskowitz, 45, of Flushing,
N.Y., are expected to appear before a U.S. magistrate judge in federal court in
Brooklyn later Wednesday.
In the complaint, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's office in Brooklyn
alleged Metter and Moskowitz between January 2007 and May 2010 publicly
reported the company had secured purchase orders or made sales to five
customers that did not exist.
The purported sales accounted for as much as 99% of Spongetech's revenue,
prosecutors said.
During that time frame, the men allegedly filed multiple false reports with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and issued numerous press releases
touting the false sales figures, typically via the Internet, prosecutors said
in the complaint.
Since the SEC issued subpoenas in September as part of a formal probe of
Spongetech, Metter and Moskowitz allegedly have tried to fabricate the
existence of the five purported customers, according to the complaint.
They allegedly sought to create Web sites and virtual offices for the
companies, have furnished investigators with phony purchase orders and produced
"questionable documentation" purportedly constituting proof of payments by the
customers, prosecutors said in the complaint.
-By Chad Bray, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-227-2017; chad.bray@ dowjones .com
Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's most
important business and market news, analysis and commentary:
http://www.djnewsplus.com/nae/al?rnd=2TcF4DCAFoLodMzLtz7Oow%3D%3D. You can use
this link on the day this article is published and the following day.
ich hoffe sie schmoren lange
soviel tage wie ich shares habe
ok und ich bin für sippenhaft
die enkel müssten dann ja auch noch
Du bist mir ja einer, aber ich habe es ja gleich gesagt besser auf niemanden mit solche Möchtegern Infos hören.
Ich möchte das gar nicht glauben, habe selbst vor 2 wochen mit dem car sponge mein auto gewaschen, subber war das teil.
ich bin gespannt auf weitere meldungen diesbezüglich!
In reply to: None Post # of 224332
SEC Charges Spongetech and Senior Executives in Pump-and-Dump Scheme
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2010-70
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-70.htm
Washington, D.C., May 5, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged New York City-based Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc., an affiliate, and five people involved in a massive pump-and-dump scheme that deceived investors into believing they were buying stock in a highly successful company.
The SEC alleges that Spongetech CEO Michael Metter and another senior executive, Steven Moskowitz, hyped fictional customers and grossly exaggerated sales figures through dozens of bogus press releases and fraudulent SEC filings to pump up demand for stock in Spongetech, a company that sells soap-filled sponges. After flooding the market with the false information to fraudulently inflate the stock price, Metter, Moskowitz, and Spongetech dumped approximately 2.5 billion shares by illegally selling them to the public through affiliated entities in unregistered transactions. They spent portions of their illicit profits in highly visible sponsorship deals with professional sports teams to further create the aura that Spongetech was a well-known and prosperous business.
The SEC suspended trading in Spongetech stock on Oct. 5, 2009, due to questions about the accuracy of the company's press releases and SEC filings. In today's enforcement action, Spongetech is accused of obstructing the SEC's investigation by producing phony sales documents in an attempt to legitimize the make-believe customers it hyped to the public. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York today announced a parallel criminal action in the matter.
"Spongetech used a menu of manipulative strategies to perpetuate this scheme, including fake sales orders and public statements as well as obstruction of the SEC's investigation," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "We will utilize all available means, including referral to criminal authorities, to prosecute those who attempt to thwart our investigations."
Christopher Conte, Associate Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, added, "Investors were deceived into believing that Spongetech was a successful business, while Spongetech and its senior executives were illegally dumping shares into the market."
Two of Spongetech's former attorneys — Jack Halperin and Joel Pensley — and stock promoter George Speranza are also charged in the SEC's complaint, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. RM Enterprises International Inc., an affiliate through which Spongetech dumped shares, is also charged.
According to the SEC's complaint, after several years of relatively little business with a single customer comprising the bulk of Spongetech's limited sales, Metter and Moskowitz began to paint a more promising and misleading picture of Spongetech's business. Beginning in approximately April 2007, Spongetech issued dozens of phony press releases touting increasingly larger, yet fictitious, sales orders and revenue. The press releases fraudulently exaggerated the demand for pre-soaped sponges by referencing millions of dollars in sales orders, business, and revenue from five primary customers that purportedly accounted for 99 percent of Spongetech's business, yet none of those customers actually existed.
The SEC's complaint alleges that Metter, Moskowitz, Spongetech, and RM Enterprises used false and baseless attorney opinion letters by Pensley and Halperin to distribute shares of Spongetech to the public. Metter, Moskowitz, and Spongetech also used false and misleading attorney opinion letters — forged in Pensley's name and in the name of a fictitious lawyer, David Bomart — which were transmitted to Spongetech's transfer agents. The SEC further alleges that Speranza created websites and rented unoccupied office space for the fictional customers in an attempt to legitimize them.
The SEC's complaint alleges that Spongetech violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-13, 15d-1, 15d-11, and 15d-13. The complaint alleges that RM Enterprises violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The SEC alleges Metter and Moskowitz violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1, 13b2-2 (Moskowitz only), and 15d-14, and Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and aided and abetted Spongetech's violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 15(d) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-13, 15d-1, 15d-11, and 15d-13. The SEC further alleges Speranza violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, and aided and abetted violations of Sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission also alleges Pensley and Halperin violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5.
The SEC thanks the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for their assistance in this matter. The SEC's investigation is continuing.
# # #
For more information about this enforcement action, contact:
Christopher Conte
Associate Director, SEC Division of Enforcement
(202) 551-4834 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (202) 551-4834 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-70.htm
Welche Geschäfte ?
Ich denke der Trading-Halt kommt gleich...???
Aber wer weiss...