Patriot Scientific der Highflyer 2006
Interview Covers Growing Licensing Portfolio, Market Valuation, the Company
Shareholder Meeting and Future Expansion of PTSC
CARLSBAD, Calif., Oct. 23 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Jim Turley,
president and CEO of Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board:
PTSC), will be featured in an exclusive audio interview with Matthew Cooper
of WallSt.net. The interview is scheduled to take place on Wednesday,
October 24 at 10:30 a.m. EDT and will be posted on http://www.wallst.net by
8:00 p.m. EDT the same day.
Turley will provide an update on the company's shareholder meeting,
which takes place October 23 in Carlsbad, Calif. The WallSt interview will
also cover Patriot's growing licensing portfolio, Turley's views on
Patriot's current stock valuation and his vision for the company in the
next 12 to 18 months, among other topics.
Recently Patriot Scientific was ranked # 4 in the Deloitte and Touche
LLP "Technology Fast 50" for the San Diego area. The ranking was based on
the company's phenomenal 2,772% growth over the past five years. Patriot
ranked above such well-known companies as Qualcomm; DivX, Inc.; Leap
Wireless, and others.
About Patriot Scientific
Patriot Scientific is a leading intellectual property licensing company
that develops, markets, and enables innovative technologies to address the
demands in fast-growing markets such as wireless devices, smart cards, home
appliances and gateways, set-top boxes, entertainment technology,
automotive telematics, biomedical devices, and industrial controllers.
Headquartered in Carlsbad, Calif., information about the company can be
found at http://www.ptsc.com.
An investment profile on Patriot Scientific may be found at
http://www.hawkassociates.com/ptscprofile.aspx. Copies of Patriot
Scientific press releases, current price quotes, stock charts and other
valuable information for investors may be found at
http://www.hawkassociates.com and http://www.americanmicrocaps.com. To
receive free e-mail notification of future releases for Patriot Scientific,
sign up at http://www.hawkassociates.com/email.aspx.
About WallSt.net
WallStreet Direct, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Financial Media
Group, Inc. (http://www.financialmediagroupinc.com) owns and operates
http://www.wallst.net. The Web site is a leading provider of timely
business news, executive interviews, multimedia content and research tools.
Financial Media Group, Inc. also owns http://www.mywallst.net and Financial
Filings Corp. (http://www.financialfilings.com).
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time
involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the
effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets,
variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, technical
development risks, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the
company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
CONTACTS:
Patriot Scientific Media Relations
John Radewagen
Vice President, Corporate Communications
The Hoffman Agency
408-975-3005
408-219-9199 (mobile)
jradewagen@hoffman.com
http://www.hoffman.com
Patriot Scientific Investor Relations
Hawk Associates
Frank Hawkins or Ken AuYeung
(305) 451-1888
info@hawkassociates.com
SOURCE Patriot Scientific Corporation
--------------------------------------------------
Link to this page:
back to top
Related links:
http://www.patriotscientific.com
http://www.wallst.net
http://www.hawkassociates.com
http://www.financialmediagroupinc.com
Nachrichten werden ja z.Z. reichlich produziert...
Grüße Abenteurer
Posted by: wolfpackvolt on October 23, 2007 03:56PM
New Pacer--Unfortunately this was scanned in Pacer. If you would like to view this document e-mail me at wolfpackvoltare@aol.com
wolfpackvolt
Date Filed # Docket Text
10/22/2007 350 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 314 Order by Technology Properties Limitied, Inc. (ehs, ) (Entered: 10/23/2007)
Posted by: docepg on October 23, 2007 05:21PM
Meeting started @ 10:05. About 60 people attended. It was announced that Turley's talk would be put on a web cast for the rest of the shareholders to see. Turley spent (wasted) all of his time (and ours) telling of the tremendous accomplishments that have occurred. Clifford Flowers called the meeting to order and the secretary did the proxy vote thing. The 2 items were carried. Repurchased 7 million shares from Lincoln and repurchased 18 million on open market for 11 million dollars. Trial is set for January. He talked about how they were working on an acquisition , merger, that would bring in a cash flow, up and to the left. (pie in the sky, since we don't have a multimillion dollar credit line. So what can you buy with your good looks?) At this point of the meeting I could see everyone's blood pressure rising. When the Q & A started, the BS came to a halt. Great questions were asked by the shareholders. Why is the share price going nowhere and what are you doing to improve it? Turley, we don't control S.P. How will you purchase a cash flow company, hopefully not with treasury shares at $0.43. No. All questions regarding litigation could not be answered for obvious reasons and no clues were give as to time of possible results. Swartz spokes person got up and said that nothing would happen until the trial was settled. The board was asked what experience they had with acquisitions. Most had peripheral experience with other companies. Board members and Turley were asked why they never buy shares on the open market if they really feel the price is under valued? Answer, some have, years ago. Ron asked what they were doing to promote the stock? Basically they said more of the same. As 12:00 rolled around, Turley cut off questions without all being asked or answered. (lunch was more important to him)
As we walked out my wife asked me, what do you think? I answered, I think the company will do good because of the patents, because of TT&L,and because of TPL. Many people made difficult efforts to get to this meeting and I personally was disappointed with what we were told.
Posted by: l2007s on October 23, 2007 05:36PM
Swartz did say it all comes down to Jan 8 (or sooner, if there is a settlement). If it goes all the way to trial and we lose, then sp could go to 15 cents. However, if we win, it could go to a dollar or more in a short period of time.
JT- has been talking to several companies. The goal is to narrow it down to a handful of companies which will allow PTSC to either make a product that actually gets shipped in a box or offer an intangible. What we don't want is to fund somebody's science project
Questions were direct ....answers did not seem to be dodged by anyone.
In the end, JT, NT and Flowers just about said they would not lend their names and reputations nor would they relocate their families for a company that had no potential.
They said news is released as fast as they become aware of it. Efforts are being made to try to attract larger investors.
Deb....if I misquoted you or left anything out....my apologies....you can correct on your own post.
Laurie
Posted by: docepg on October 23, 2007 05:52PM
In response to: Deb's take on SHM by l2007s
"They said news is released as fast as they become aware of it."
actually, they said they would release news that the felt they could, as fast as they become aware of it. Slightly different. Actully what they didn't say was that they didn't know what price range of acquisition to look for, 2 million or 200 million. That will be answered after the trial. Doc
Zitat: http://www.agoracom.com/ir/patriot/messages/604970#message von Ronran
und ganz kurz zum SharePrice: http://www.agoracom.com/ir/patriot/messages/604574#message
http://www.agoracom.com/ir/patriot/messages/604929
mit Verweis auf diese
http://www.agoracom.com/ir/patriot/messages/604724#new-message
Transmeta Triples on Intel Deal
By TSC Staff
10/24/2007 9:30 AM EDT
Transmeta (TMTA - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating) soared 241% early Wednesday after the chip company scored a $150 million patent-settlement payout from Intel
Transmeta will also get a $20 million annual patent license payment from Intel. In return, Intel agrees not to sue Transmeta for the development and licensing to third parties of Transmeta's LongRun and LongRun2 technologies.
"We are very pleased to have reached this agreement with Intel," said Les Crudele, president and CEO of Transmeta. "We believe that this arrangement will create value for Transmeta stockholders both by realizing immediate financial value for our intellectual property rights and by supporting our technology development and licensing business going forward."
Shares rose $10.11 to $14.29.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Technology Properties Limited, Inc .,
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
Fujitsu Limited, et al.,
Defendants.
STIPULATION
The parties stipulate that, for purposes of this lawsuit only, the Transputer Referenc e Manual, INMOS Ltd . 1988 (ISBN No . 0-13-929001-x ; MEI-ED0012498-12865) is prior art to US Patent No. 5,809,336 pursuant to 35 U .S .C . § 102(b)
DATED : October 26, 2007
David J . Healey (lead attorney)
Texas State Bar No . 09327980
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
700 Louisiana St ., Ste. 1600
Houston, TX 77002
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a)on this 26th day of October, 2007. As of this date, all counsel of record has consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy of this document through the Court's CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
Nathaniel McPherson
Monday, October 29 2007 8:59 AM, EST
Royal Philips Purchases Moore Microprocessor Patent(TM) Portfolio License
Business Wire "US Press Releases "
CUPERTINO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--
Alliacense today announced that Royal Philips Electronics has purchased a Moore Microprocessor Patent(TM) (MMP) Portfolio license from The TPL Group. Philips becomes the 21st MMP licensee in as many months and the third major European company to purchase an MMP license following Schneider Electric and Nokia Corporation.
"We welcome the expansion of our program with Philips, a proven worldwide leader in medical equipment and consumer electronics. This agreement further validates the strength and broad scope of the MMP Portfolio," said Andre-Pascal Chauvin, Vice President, Licensing for Alliacense.
"It's pretty common to see the pace of deals pick up as trial approaches," said Mike Davis, Sr. Vice President, Licensing. "A number of companies that have been following the case closely needed a little time to evaluate the recent Markman ruling, and are now moving to capture licenses at current prices and avoid significantly higher royalty rates following trial."
"Other developments we're watching with interest include mounting pressure from retailers on product manufacturers to resolve patent infringement issues expeditiously and avoid major market disruptions that could result from injunction or ban on imports," said Davis. This issue was highlighted recently in Broadcom v. Qualcomm ITC case, which placed a ban on the import of new mobile handsets and led one mobile service provider, Verizon, to step in and resolve the matter on its own.
The sweeping scope of applications using MMP design techniques continues to encourage manufacturers of end user products from around the globe to become MMP licensees. Since January 2006, HP, Casio, Fujitsu, Sony, Nikon, Seiko Epson, Pentax, Olympus, Kenwood, Agilent, Lexmark, Schneider Electric, NEC Corporation, Funai Electric, SanDisk, Sharp Corporation, Nokia, Bull, LEGO, and Denso Wave have all purchased MMP Portfolio licenses.
About the MMP Portfolio
The Moore Microprocessor Patent Portfolio contains intellectual property that is jointly owned by the privately-held TPL Group and publicly-held Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTCBB TSC). The portfolio includes seven U.S. patents as well as their European and Japanese counterparts. It is becoming widely recognized that the jointly-owned patents protect fundamental technology used in designing microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), embedded processors and system-on-chip (SoC) devices. Manufacturers of microprocessor-based products can learn more about how to participate in the MMP Portfolio Licensing Program by contacting: mmp-licensing@alliacense.com.
About Royal Philips Electronics
Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands is a global leader in healthcare, lifestyle and technology, delivering products, services and solutions through the brand promise of "sense and simplicity". Headquartered in the Netherlands, Philips employs approximately 125,800 employees in more than 60 countries worldwide. With sales of EUR 27 billion in 2006, the company is a market leader in medical diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring systems, energy efficient lighting solutions, personal care and home appliances, as well as consumer electronics. News from Philips is located at www.philips.com/newscenter.
About Alliacense
Alliacense is a TPL Group Enterprise executing best-in-class design and implementation of Intellectual Property (IP) licensing programs. As a cadre of IP licensing strategists, technology experts, and experienced business development/management executives, Alliacense focuses on expanding the awareness and value of TPL's IP portfolios. Founded in 1988, The TPL Group has emerged as a coalition of high technology enterprises involved in the development, management and commercialization of proprietary product technologies as well as the design, manufacture and sales of proprietary products based on those technologies and corresponding IP assets. For more information, visit www.alliacense.com.
Alliacense and Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) are trademarks of Technology Properties Limited (TPL). All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Source: Alliacense
Moderation
Zeitpunkt: 30.10.07 08:53
Aktion: Löschung des Beitrages
Kommentar: Regelverstoß - Falschaussagen
Zeitpunkt: 30.10.07 08:53
Aktion: Löschung des Beitrages
Kommentar: Regelverstoß - Falschaussagen
Several assertions have been made relating to alleged infringement of U.S. patent No. 5,440,749 and related dependent patents (the so-called Moore Patent Portfolio) relating to microprocessor technology and co-owned by Technology Properties and Patriot Scientific (now joined in the new company Alliacense). Because of sales by Philips of TriMedia microprocessors in the U.S., Technology Properties and Patriot Scientific in the past offered to settle for USD 22 million but did not want to substantiate their case. Philips refused the offer and is of the opinion that its microprocessors did not infringe the patents involved.
Patriot Scientific approached a number of Japanese PC companies, such as Sony, Matsushita, Fujitsu, NEC and Toshiba. Intel, as supplier of Pentium chips, came to their defense. In 2004, Sanyo asked Philips for assistance in their defense. Philips explained that it does not believe that the Philips microprocessors infringe. Recently, Intel, which produces similar microprocessors to those that Philips does, took a license from Technology Properties and Patriot Scientific for an amount of USD 10 to 25 million. In addition, Bosch and Agfa Gevaert recently sent a letter to Philips indicating that they had been approached by Alliacense for alleged infringement by products incorporating Philips microprocessors and asking for indemnification. Philips Semiconductors is receiving questions from more customers about the Moore patents. Recently, Alliacense approached Philips Consumer Electronics again to present their claim against microprocessors used in products from both Philips Consumer Electronics and Philips Medical Systems. Because the patents pertain to microprocessor technology, Philips Consumer Electronics and Philips Medical Systems are requesting indemnification from their suppliers, including Philips Semiconductors.
Alliacense primarily approaches companies such as Sanyo, Bosch, Agfa Gevaert, and Philips Consumer Electronics that manufacture finished products incorporating microprocessors, relying on patent claims that allegedly cover the combination of microprocessors with other components. Although Philips Semiconductors is generally not liable for infringement by the combinations, Philips Semiconductors could be liable in case their products implement all features of one or more of the Moore patent claims. Besides from indemnification requests by customers, liability could also arise from Alliacense directly if they would decide to approach Philips Semiconductors (risking exhaustion of their patents. However, Alliacense like their predecessors declined to discuss a license on the chip level, keeping their focus on higher value products.
• Several manufacturers have recently entered into license agreements with Alliacense, including Fujitsu, HP, Sony, apparently not protected by their customer status of Intel and AMD.
Im vorstehenden alten Posting wurde von 22 Mio Dollar gesprochen. Da waren aber noch nicht alle Philips - Gesellschaften dabei, und es war deutlich vor dem Marman-Hearing. Nach den starken Worten in der Presseerklärung müßte der jetzige Betrag höher liegen.
Den genauen Betrag werden wir höchstens aus den Quartalszahlen ableiten können.
Das nervt und wird dem Kurs nichts nutzen, also mind. 50 Mio USD sollten es schon sein !!
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
Technology Properties Limited and Patriot
Scientific Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.;
Panasonic Corporation of North America; JVC
Americas Corp.; NEC Electronics America,
Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America,
Inc.; Toshiba America Electronic Components,
Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems,
Inc.; Toshiba America Consumer Products,
LLC; ARM, Inc.; and ARM, Ltd.
Defendants.
JURY DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET
CONTROL ORDER WITH RESPECT TO DEADLINES FOR EXPERT REPORTS
COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendants (“Parties”) seeking the Court’s
extension of the deadlines for: 1) designate expert witnesses for parties with burden of proof
other than claim construction, and 2) serve expert witness reports. The Parties request that these
deadlines be extended by one day, from October 29, 2007 to October 30, 2007.
This extension is not being sought for the purpose of delay.
Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to this motion.
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully pray that the Court grant this Motion and
permit the above extension.
2
DATED: October 29, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Scott F. Partridge
Scott F. Partridge
Lead Attorney
Texas State Bar No. 00786940
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel.: (713) 229-1569
Fax: (713) 229-7769
scott.partridge@bakerbotts.com
OF COUNSEL:
L. Gene Spears
Texas State Bar No. 18896350
gene.spears@bakerbotts.com
Michael Hawes
Texas State Bar No. 24010761
michael.hawes@bakerbotts.com
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza
910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel.: (713) 229-1234
Fax: (713) 229-1522
Michael C. Smith
Texas State Bar No. 18650410
The Roth Law Firm
PO Box 876
115 North Wellington, Suite 200
Marshall, TX 75670
Tel: (903) 935-1665
Fax: (903) 935-1797
ms@rothfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America, Inc.;
Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.;
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; and
Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 29, 2007, PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER WITH
RESPECT FOR EXPERT REPORTS was served electronically, via CM/ECF, on all counsel of
record who are deemed to have consented to such service under the Court’s local rules. Any
other counsel of record will be served via facsimile and certified mail, return receipt requested.
/s/ Scott F. Partridge
Scott F. Partridge
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Counsel for the Toshiba Defendants has discussed the above Motion with counsel
for Plaintiffs, the MEI Defendants and the NEC Defendant on October 29, 2007, and all counsel
have indicated they are in agreement with this Motion.
/s/ Scott F. Partridge
"Toshiba Semiconductors supplies Philips with semiconductor technologies for a diverse range of products including memory chips for MP3 players, flat TV and digital audio"
So, Phillips admitts that Toshiba chips infringe? Nice.
"Philips also praises Toshiba Semiconductor’s responsiveness and competitiveness in volatile markets."
Lets see how reponsive toshiba is to their customers when they got caught with their hands in our cookie jar.
aus Agoracom, aber interessant.
Ich denke eher, Philips wurde wieder sehr günstig eine Lizenz verkauft, nur um überhaupt mal wieder einen Lizenznehmer zu haben. Zudem einen in Europa recht bekannten. Die Strategie wird seit langem gefahren: große Namen, kleine Summen. Der Markt (und evtl auch der Richter in TX) soll mit den Lizenznehmern beeindruckt werden. Nur finanziell war das bisher mehr als traurig (und wird es mE bis zu einem positiven Urteil in TX auch bleiben)
Trotzdem, ich vermute das selbst nach einen positiven Urteil, PTSC seinen Lizenzeinnahmern hinterher laufen muss, und die entspr. Summen u.U. wird einklagen müssen. Wenn dann ein Vergleich zustande kommt, gibts meisst doch nur einen Bruchteil der geforderten SUmme (oder?)
Wenn Texas schlecht ausgeht...naja.
http://www.silverlake.com/content.php?page=investments-portfolio&id=21
Mit Deiner rosaroten Brille bist Du bei w:o besser aufgehoben (aber da bist Du ja schon...)
Glaube mal schön weiter an die über 20 Mios. Sony wurde ja auch "besonders" behandelt. Vielleicht kommen da ja auch noch mal ein paar Mios dazu.
Und wenn dann die Quartalszahlen kommen, sagen eh wieder alle, dass ja nicht mehr erwartet wurde - und der Kurs rutscht ab.
Naja, mir ist das egal. Mich hat PTSC schon fast zum Millionär gemacht. Aber nicht als Longie, sondern als Trader (immer schön kurz nach den News verkaufen, wenn die dummen Longies einem die Teile aus der Hand nehmen...).