Neomedia: Fakten, Chancen und Risiken
Seite 41 von 245 Neuester Beitrag: 04.11.21 19:27 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 11.05.12 13:19 | von: menschmaier | Anzahl Beiträge: | 7.12 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 04.11.21 19:27 | von: iDonk | Leser gesamt: | 922.599 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 241 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 38 | 39 | 40 | | 42 | 43 | 44 | ... 245 > |
1999-2000 leider auf die viel zitierte "Blase" gesetzt. *PLOP*(,geplatzt! es hätte mein erstes Auto werden können....) aber nicht umsonst bereut selbst Manfred Krug für ein "rosa Produkt " geworben zu haben.Asceplion,nemetschek,infinion,comroad,mp3.com usw usw. manch einer wird sich erinnern.
2011 / 09 versuchter Neustart mit mässigem Erfolg. regelmässiges lesen in Foren bereichert evt. den Horizont, schützt aber im allgemeinen nicht vor Verlusten. Eigenes recherchieren ist in meinen Augen das A&O.Mich persönlich bringt es leider nicht immer zum Ziel, siehe ( Bsp:Solos Endoscopy, stosse ich trotz intensiver Suche auf minimale Infos...) deshalb greife ich gerne auf Foren zurück und bilde mir so mein eigenes Mosaik. Mir geht es mitlerweile unglaublich auf den S..."Keks", wenn ich mir hier geistigen Dünn..... durchlesen muss. Hier geben sich ne Menge Leute viel Mühe und erörtern Problemlagen mit Worten, denen auch geistig arme folgen können. DAFÜR EINMAL DANK AN ALLE DIE MEiNEREINS DIE BÖRSENWELT ERKLÄRT! :)
Kurz und knapp gesagt, tut jmd. wie der Rubbel wirklich Not? Früher gabs Tintenkiller,innovativ, nun gut, "Herlitz ging auch den Bach runter ".
Heute gibt es QR codes, ebenfalls innovativ. Was ich sagen will, die hier Investierten scheinen an etwas zu glauben, ob es die mitlerweile gängigste Software ist, die Übernahme durch global player wie Dr.X, Google, Facebook, Ebay oder eben Apple, oder das Überleben von NEOM durch Patente die Milliarden schwer sein können.Man sollte nicht immer die Handy Sparte betrachten, die Möglichkeiten durch Erkennungsgeräte im medizinischen und logistischen Bereich, mit Datenerfassung und Verarbeitung durch QR Codes sind phänomenal.
Ich habe keinen blassen Schimmer ob NEOM die beste Software besitzt, ahnte es viele bei Bill Gates? Ohne diesen Glauben und das gewisse Glück eine derart schnelllebige Zukunft Trades zu verpacken hätte niemand Microsoft gekauft. Wünsche allen Beteiligten viel Erfolg und würde auch weiterhin über fundierte Analysen und Infos freuen, werde mich auch gerne beteiligen. Manchem gehört jedoch Gicht an die Finger gewünscht.
New IBM product seems very similar in operation to neom product and patents.
Does it to anyone else?
IBM to Pitch Augmented Reality as a Retail Sales Aid
By Joab Jackson, IDG News Jul 1, 2012 9:20 pm
As part of the company's Smarter Commerce marketing effort, IBM is investigating the possibility of using augmented reality (AR) to help retailers provide more product information to their customers, as well as to gather more information about customers.
The company's research labs have designed a prototype of a mobile application that can be used by store goers to identify products and retrieve more information about potential products. The company is testing it now with a number of retailers.
"This is a neat way of providing customers with more information about products, which they would normally [research] on the Web," said Jill Puleri, IBM retail vice president. "It's also a way for a retailer to target and change behavior, and get some cross-selling and up-selling going with consumers."
If implemented, the technology could be one of the first commercial uses of augmented reality. AR is the process of overlaying a view of something with additional computer-generated information. Televised American football games, for instance, will highlight with computer graphics the exact location -- called the first-down line -- that a team must pass to continue playing. AR can be implemented in user headsets or, with IBM's technology, a smartphone's camera viewfinder.
The idea behind the app, according to IBM, is to help the retailer provide more information to the shopper while they are in the store, rather than letting the consumer return home after a store visit to further investigate products on the Internet, increasing the likelihood that they will buy the product online.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is how it works: A user entering a store can download the application, register, fill out a user profile and then use the app to find out more data about products in the store that are of interest. The user would aim the phone toward a product of interest and the app will use the phone's built-in video camera to identify the product using image-processing techniques. The identification process might work similar to how QR (quick-response) barcodes are used today, though it would not require the product packaging to contain a barcode, and would allow the retailer, rather than the product vendor, to present the information about the product.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once the product is identified, the app can then download more information from an IBM server, such as ingredients, product specifications, price, reviews and applicable discounts. It could provide information tailored to the individual user, such as if the product being reviewed triggers allergies. With the user's permission, the app could also send a notice to the user's social networks, alerting friends and associates that this individual is shopping at the retail outlet.
In addition to providing an app for customers to use, IBM will also provide the tools that will allow retailers to analyze the information generated by consumers when they use the app, such as the products and features they found of most interest. It could also be used to provide digital coupons and serve as the basis of customer loyalty programs.
"We have found in our research that consumers have a huge open-mindedness about sharing information about themselves if they get something of value back," Puleri said.
IBM is working with a number of clients to test the mobile application and associated software, though it has not discussed when it would commercially offer the package. It could represent a large market for IBM, though. In-store shopping still accounts for more than 92 percent of all retail volume, according to Forrester Research.
The company also has no plans at present to release the mobile app as a stand-alone technology, which was first developed in a company lab in Israel, or use it as part of a retail-wide standard. This solutions-based approach "gives the customer to the first right to market. It will give them a competitive advantage," Puleri said.
Wo sind die Dummpusher geblieben, haben wohl ihr Werk getan?
Immer das gleiche mit denen, kann man einen drauf lassen.
Die Pillen mußt Du aber auch pünktlich nehmen, sonst nützen die nichts....
Dann klappts auch mit den Stimmungsschwankungen.
Gute Besserung
M!
...man scrolle ein wenig nach unten und schenke der rechten Seite seine volle Aufmerksamkeit. Facebook schmückt sich immer häufiger mit unserer NEOM :)
den facebookblauen Rock trägt sie ja schon. Es fehlt nur noch das passende Oberteil
und ein Ton in Ton farbender Schleier, als quasi Zuckerguss,-berg oben druff.
Traumhochzeit in meinen Augen.
Verschliesst doch nicht dieselbigen vor einer evt. weltumfassenden Technik.
UND NOCH EINS: Diese Dr.Soon, x und No stories sind gar nicht mal so weit hergeholt, zumindest was man ihm unterstellt. Selbst unter Medikamenten / Verpackungen! sind qr-codes zu finden.
Spinne mal ein wenig mit meinem begrenzten Horizont :)
Ein BSP wäre das Einscannen zum Erhalt der Packungsbeilage und das gleichzeitige Abgleichen auf Nebenwirkungen mit vorher gespeicherten Medikamenten im Handy....
muss man eigentlich immer " Dies ist keine Kaufempfehlung, schon gar nicht für M.Z. " dazuschreiben?
geruhsame Nacht
Jeder kann sich seinen Part darauf denken, - ALLES was "Sicherheitsrelevante" Bedeutung hat, wird auf das "Original" setzen müssen....
Verwaltung, Handel, Gesundheit, Justiz, Bildung, bargeldloser Zahlungsablauf auch möglich?
Keiner kann sich Hackerpannen leisten. Jeder muß auf Sicherheit machen!
Was bleibt da sonst als NEOM?
Dauert nur länger als gedacht......
Mir aber auch egal, das kommt schon noch....
Witzpreise nach wie vor, - bin drin, bleibe es auch, und fühl mich gut dabei!
Ich habe Zeit.
Beste Midnightgrüße
M!
Wann war nochmal die Verhandlung? 13. oder 17. Juli?
vermute ich zumindest
http://co.findacase.com/research/...q/fac.20120503_0003018.DCO.htm/qx
Was hat denn www.neomedia.de mit dieser Aktie zu tun.
www.neom.com triffts wohl eher.
Wenn ich falsch liege, klär mich auf.
Ich glaube seit 2003 wird mindestens einmal jedes Jahr diese Seite (neomedia.de) hier eingestellt.
Und die Betreiber der Seite wundern sich bestimmt warum man an einem Tag plötzlich 500 Besucher mehr hat als sonst. Hihi.
Naja, kann passieren, war bestimmt auch nicht das letzte Mal.
Die in Deutschland tätigen Mitarbeiter gehören übrigens der NeoMedia Europe AG an.
Ein Tochterunternehmen mit Sitz in Würselen.
Beispiel sieht man hier:
http://www.neom.com/node/371
Gooooo NEOM !
http://whois.domaintools.com/neomedia.de
Und hier das Original:
http://whois.domaintools.com/neom.com
Not what you're looking for? Try an advanced search.
Neomedia Technologies, Inc v. Spyderlynk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
May 3, 2012
NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
SPYDERLYNK, LLC, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING
This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland by Judge Marcia S. Krieger, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated April 24, 2012. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1) The court will hold a scheduling/planning conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) on: July 16, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.
The conference will be held in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any party*fn1 , that party shall confer with opposing parties and contact my chambers to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date. Please remember anyone entering the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2 B.
A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of scheduling order can be downloaded from the court's website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. (Click on "Forms" in the blue box at the left side of the screen and scroll down under the Civil section to the bold heading "Standardized Order Forms"). Parties shall prepare the proposed scheduling order in accordance with the court's form. Please note that the form of scheduling order was modified December 2010. Parties are directed to use the modified form.
The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.4.0, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a WordPerfect or Word format sent via e-mailed to Boland_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, all as required by ECF Procedure V.4.0. 5.12(A)(2) and 5.12(B)(1) and (2), on or before: July 9, 2012
Attorneys and/or parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed scheduling order on paper to the Clerk's Office. However, if any party in the case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed scheduling order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures.
The plaintiff shall notify all parties who have not yet entered an appearance of the date and time of the scheduling/planning conference and provide a copy of this Order to those parties.
(2) In preparation for the scheduling/planning conference, the parties are directed to confer in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before: June 25, 2012
The court encourages the parties to meet face to face, but if that is not possible, the parties may meet by telephone conference. All parties are jointly responsible for arranging and attending the Rule 26(f) meeting.
During the Rule 26(f) meeting, the parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case; make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1); and develop their proposed scheduling/discovery plan. The parties should also discuss the possibility of informal discovery, such as conducting joint interviews with potential witnesses, joint meetings with clients, depositions via telephone, or exchanging documents outside of formal discovery.
In those cases in which (i) the parties' substantive allegations involve extensive computer-generated records; (ii) a substantial amount of disclosure or discovery will involve information or records in electronic form (i.e., e-mail, word processing, databases); (iii) expert witnesses will develop testimony based in large part on computer data and/or modeling; or
(iv) any party plans to present a substantial amount of evidence in digital form at trial, the parties shall confer regarding steps they can take to preserve computer records and data, facilitate computer-based discovery, resolve privilege issues, limit discovery costs and delay, and avoid discovery disputes relating to electronic discovery. The parties shall be prepared to discuss these issues, as appropriate, in the proposed scheduling order and at the scheduling/planning conference.
These are the minimum requirements for the Rule 26(f) meeting. The parties are encouraged to have a comprehensive discussion and are required to approach the meeting cooperatively and in good faith. The parties are reminded that the purpose of the Rule 26(f) meeting is to expedite the disposition of the action, discourage wasteful pretrial activities, and improve the quality of any eventual trial through more thorough preparation. The discussion of claims and defenses shall be a substantive, meaningful discussion.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) no discovery shall be sought prior to the Rule 26(f) meeting.
(3) The parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before: July 9, 2012
Counsel and parties are reminded that the mandatory disclosure requirements encompass computer-based evidence which may be used to support claims or defenses. Mandatory disclosures must be supplemented by the parties consistent with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e). Mandatory disclosures and supplementation are not to be filed with the Clerk of the Court.
(4) All parties are expected to be familiar with the Local Rules of Practice for the District of Colorado. Copies are available from the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, or through the District Court's web site: www.cod.uscourts.gov. All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3 prior to the scheduling/planning conference.
BY THE COURT:
Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge
Buy This Entire Record for $4.95
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.