Palantir mit Börsengang
Seite 127 von 293 Neuester Beitrag: 06.11.24 23:25 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 29.09.20 19:48 | von: Moneyboxer | Anzahl Beiträge: | 8.305 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 06.11.24 23:25 | von: Is nur Geld | Leser gesamt: | 2.321.130 |
Forum: | Börse | Leser heute: | 755 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 125 | 126 | | 128 | 129 | ... 293 > |
Ob die Meldung Fake ist das kann ich dir nicht beantworten aber auf keiner Seite ist irgendwas darüber zu finden...Mal abwarten
Zum Goldinvest findest du im FORM 10-Q folgendes:
https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/...c-4c4a-bc0f-980d82d17d20.pdf
Seite 22:
Investment in Gold
During August 2021, the Company purchased $50.7 million in 100-ounce gold bars. Such purchase will initially be kept in a secure third-party facility located in the northeastern United States and the Company is able to take physical possession of the gold bars stored at the facility at any time with
reasonable notice.
Wünsche euch ein schönen Tag und Mal sehen wie wir heute stehen
Investment company Founders Fund II Management, LLC (Current Portfolio) buys Sprinklr Inc, sells Palantir Technologies Inc during the 3-months ended 2021Q2,
These are the top 5 holdings of Founders Fund II Management, LLC
Sprinklr Inc (CXM) - 64,103 shares, 100.00% of the total portfolio. New Position
Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR) - 0 shares, 0.00% of the total portfolio. Shares reduced by 10000%
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/...ii-management-llc-003817137.html
Man stelle sich nur vor, die ganzen Lieferkettenlogistik effizienter zu machen. Aus den vorhandenen Daten die Fakten auszulesen um in der Zukunft genauere Prognosen zu machen. Die Abwicklung von Projekten wird signifikant einfacher mit Palantir!
Ich finde, der derzeitige Kurs spiegelt nicht den Unternehmenswert wieder. Da es am Aktienmarkt schwierig bis unmöglich ist die Kurse vorherzusehen, kommt es kurzfristig zur Volatilität (Angebot/Nachfrage)
Einfach halten und in 10 Jahren sich über satte Gewinne freuen.
Wie schon gesagt wenn die Option ablaufen dann geht's richtig los hier,also abwarten und kaufen...
President Joe Biden called cybersecurity a "core national security challenge" in a meeting with leaders from Silicon Valley, the water and energy sectors, the banking and insurance industries and academic institutions on Wednesday to discuss shoring up the nation's cybersecurity.
"We've seen time and again how the technologies we rely on from our cell phones to pipelines, the electric grid can become targets of hackers and criminals," Biden said in opening remarks.
The summit -- involving nearly three dozen participants -- marked the Biden administration's most visible engagement yet with private sector executives following a wave of ransomware and other cyberattacks targeting US businesses and critical infrastructure operators this year.
The meeting was set to culminate in several announcements by both the US government and the private organizations, according to a senior administration official. The official declined to preview specifics of the announcements but emphasized there will be concrete steps taken to bolster the country against cyberattack. A key area of focus, the official said, is the shortage of cybersecurity talent in the United States that has led to half a million unfilled jobs in the industry.
Other announcements, the official added, will focus on enhancing the basic security of technology products so that the tech industry is not "pushing the cost of maintaining security to the users," and still other announcements could seek to flesh out the administration's recent progress on securing critical infrastructure with tools that can detect cyberattacks in real time.
The Biden administration has grappled with the limits of its authority to answer the rise in cyberattacks, a problem that affects a broad range of businesses the White House cannot directly regulate.
While the US government has rolled out mandatory data breach reporting requirements for certain sectors such as pipelines, and is increasingly using its procurement power to shape the cybersecurity practices of federal contractors, officials and experts say the White House lacks the authority to order more stringent measures like the use of two-factor authentication in private networks.
As a result, the Biden administration has tried to encourage private industry to take action voluntarily in defense of US networks.
Wednesday's summit reflects the latest in that strategy. Participants in the meeting were scheduled to speak Biden before separating into breakout groups led by Cabinet officials including DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and SBA Administrator Isabella Guzman. Other participating government leaders will include National Cyber Director Chris Inglis, national security adviser Jake Sullivan, deputy national security adviser Anne Neuberger, CISA Director Jen Easterly, National Economic Council Director Brian Deese and Office of Public Engagement Director Cedric Richmond
The three breakout sessions were focused on critical infrastructure resilience; cybersecurity talent and workforce issues; and building stronger technology and insurance solutions.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/25/politics/...ber-meeting/index.html
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/...d-access-private-social-media
https://nypost.com/2021/08/25/...unauthorized-access-to-private-data/
Ich meine diese Aussage ist neu in dem Artikel, denn gestern hieß es noch, dass sich keiner der offiziellen von PLTR geäußert hätte:
In a statement, a Palantir spokesperson said the error was caused by the FBI.
“There was no glitch in the software. Our platform has robust access and security controls. The customer also has rigorous protocols established to protect search warrant returns, which, in this case, the end user did not follow,” the spokesperson said.
Wenn ich jemanden ein Foto schicke und ich schicke es allen weil ich ein Hacken angeklickt habe kann ich doch nicht behaupten ja die Software hat ein Daten Leck.
Warum sowas veröffentlicht darf versteh es nicht der untere Text ist entscheidend