AEZS vs. KERX
Siehe Chart vom daxt.Ähnlichkeiten im Chart sind sicher nicht rein zufällig.Ähnlichkeiten mit aktuell existierenden Biofirmen sind erwünscht.
Na, wenn jetzt ganz plötzlich der Tenbagger da ist, bist Du aber echt sowas von blamiert! Ich sitze bereits im Speisewagen des AEZS Express! Und neben mir sind noch Plätze frei!
Habe dich aber genau im Blick und schaue genau was du so machst :-) möchte dich auch gern an dein Versprechen erinnern
Wie kommst du eigentlich auf eine Silbermanie?Die Hausse hat noch gar nicht angefangen.Die Ten-Bagger kommen erst noch.
Es ist sicher richtig das hier ein Risiko besteht, aber wenns klappt ne schöne Sache.Ich bin hier mit 5% vom Portofolio dabei.Das sollte reichen.
We ended the quarter with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $26.2 million, however, our cash and cash equivalent at the end of June will not be sufficient to fund our operation for the 12-month period following such date. And as a result, our second quarter financial statement, contained a footnote, disclosing material uncertainties related to events and conditions that may cast substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from June 30, 2016. We expect to address the situation before the end of the year.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/...I&li_medium=liftigniter-widget
Des Weiteren gab es nichts zu der Upfrontzahlung !
Mich würde mal der Entwicklungsstand bei Sinopharm und deren Erkenntnisse interessieren .
Aug. 10, 2016 1:38 PM ET
Richard Sachse
Thanks, Jason. It’s a logic question. The response to that question is not that straight forward, because the achievement of the 384 event not only depends on the last treatment, it also depends on when particular patients are enrolled. It’s not that all of the patients were enrolled at the same time, but it was rather an enrollment over a period of approximately one to two years. So it’s very difficult to come up with an estimation on when the achievement would have been achieved, if both treatments has been equal.
We obviously have done our calculations and we have observed the event rate from the very beginning, and based on that - as David already stated, based on that the event-rate slowed down. And now you can come up with a lot of speculations and at these days there may be many reasons to explain it. We actually tend to feel positive about it and as you are very well aware this is a fact that you can observe in quite a variety of different oncology trials with overall survival at a particular endpoint.
So in other words, we see a prolongation of what we have initially planned; this is a slower event-rate. Obviously, a longer survival rate as we initially planned. And now we just have to wait and see until we reach the 384 events.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/...ts-earnings-call-transcript?page=7
Die freuen sich schon auf Zoptrex.
Zoptarelin doxorubicin for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer — second line
http://www.hsric.nihr.ac.uk/topics/...endometrial-cancer-second-line/
An ihrer Überzeugung zum Q1 hat sich ja nichts geändert.
Wenn ich es richtig interpretiere , ist man in der Lage sich die Partner auszusuchen.
Jeder Interessent erhält eine begrenzte Zeit Zugriff auf zurückliegende Ergebnisse und hat danach die Möglichkeit ein Angebot zu unterbreiten.
Klingt alles wesentlich anders, als es der Kurs wiederspiegelt.
Vielleicht ist es die Scheu vor einer erneuten KE, obwohl die alte noch nicht gezeichnet und die Upfronts noch nicht zu Buche stehen.
Und Unsummen werden ja, da es Meilensteinzahlungen gibt, nicht mehr benötigt.
Bezug auf OS und PFS.
The median time from primary treatment to disease relapse (PFI-1) was 6.7 months. Thirty-one percent of these recurrent patients received platinum-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment. When PFI-1 and type of second-line therapy, along with race, PS, stage, grade, and prior RT were included for analysis, PFI-1 became the most significant factor predictive of survival after recurrence; race, PS, stage, grade, and prior RT remained significant. Compared with patients with a PFI-1 ≤6 months, those with PFI-1 >6 months had a 30% reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84 [P < .0001]). There was no evidence that the type of second-line therapy (platinum vs nonplatinum) was associated with survival (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.11 [P = .392])(Table 3). Furthermore, when we restricted the analysis to patients who had primary treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 483), the results were essentially the same.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.25480/full
Auch mal in die einzelnen Studien schauen!
3,20 € | +2,24% | 3,13 € | 0 | 350 | - | 12.08.16 | |||
3,219 € | +0,50% | 3,203 € | - | - | 3,203 - 3,246 | 14:00:16 | |||
3,13 € | 0,00% | 3,13 € | 0 | 0 | - | 05.08.16 | |||
3,61 $ | +1,98% | 3,54 $ | 0 | 111.263 | - | 12.08.16 | |||
3,24 € | +1,57% | 3,19 € | 300 | 2.300 | 3,174 - 3,26 | 11:09:55 | |||
3,13 € | G | -0,82% | 3,156 € | 0 | 0 | 3,13 - 3,133 | 09:10:43 | ||
3,154 € | G | +1,64% | 3,103 € | 0 | 0 | 3,154 - 3,154 | 08:37:19 |
Isses nich schön!!
Vekaufsdruck herrscht scho länger nicht mehr hier, sondern wie komme ich
noch günstiger an die Shares ;-)